2016
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient Limitation in Central Red Sea Mangroves

Abstract: As coastal plants that can survive in salt water, mangroves play an essential role in large marine ecosystems (LMEs). The Red Sea, where the growth of mangroves is stunted, is one of the least studied LMEs in the world. Mangroves along the Central Red Sea have characteristic heights of ∼2 m, suggesting nutrient limitation. We assessed the nutrient status of mangrove stands in the Central Red Sea and conducted a fertilization experiment (N, P and Fe and various combinations thereof) on 4-week-old seedlings of A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(94 reference statements)
3
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, iron resorption had not been previously assessed in mangroves. Our results reveal a low iron resorption efficiency (≤42%) for Avicennia marina in the Central of the Red Sea, about half that for N and P. The comparatively low efficiency in iron resorption, compared to N and P resorption helps explain experimental results reporting that iron additions resulted in significantly taller plants compared with complete fertilizer additions, and consistent with the biogenic nature of the sediments in the Red Sea (Almahasheer et al, 2016b), similar to the iron deficiency of seagrass growing above carbonate sediments reported in the Mexican Caribbean (Duarte et al, 1995). These results also support the findings of a mesocosm experiment (Alongi, 2010) reporting that mangroves growth in some forests may be limited by the rate at which iron is solubilized by iron-reducing bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, iron resorption had not been previously assessed in mangroves. Our results reveal a low iron resorption efficiency (≤42%) for Avicennia marina in the Central of the Red Sea, about half that for N and P. The comparatively low efficiency in iron resorption, compared to N and P resorption helps explain experimental results reporting that iron additions resulted in significantly taller plants compared with complete fertilizer additions, and consistent with the biogenic nature of the sediments in the Red Sea (Almahasheer et al, 2016b), similar to the iron deficiency of seagrass growing above carbonate sediments reported in the Mexican Caribbean (Duarte et al, 1995). These results also support the findings of a mesocosm experiment (Alongi, 2010) reporting that mangroves growth in some forests may be limited by the rate at which iron is solubilized by iron-reducing bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The average leaf nitrogen concentration in mg N g DW −1 tended to be low, about half of the levels of 2% N of DW considered to represent nitrogen-sufficient plants, similarly, the average leaf phosphorous concentration was also low, about 1/3 of the 0.2% P of DW considered to represent P-sufficient plants (cf. Almahasheer et al (2016b). And about half of the concentrations that was found the same species in Kenya of about 20 mg g DW −1 , yet comparable to other species e.g., Xylocarpus granatum, Lumnitzera racemosa, Sonneratia alba in Kenya .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We do not have information regarding the balance between sulfate reduction‐sulfite oxidation at our mangrove forest and seagrass meadow sites. However, there are arguments in the literature against net sulfate reduction in carbonate sediments containing low iron (Burdige et al, ; Holmer et al, ; Hu & Burdige, ; Krumins et al, ), such as in our seagrass meadow and mangrove forest sites (Almahasheer, Duarte, & Irigoien, ; Anton et al, ; Saderne et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%