2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018jg004538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient Limitation and the Stoichiometry of Nutrient Uptake in a Tropical Rain Forest Stream

Abstract: Nutrient limitation assessment is important to understand stream ecosystem functioning.Aquatic primary producers are often limited by nitrogen, phosphorus, or both, as assessed by nutrient diffusing substrata (NDS), a common method for assessing nutrient limitation in streams. But little is known regarding how this method relates to patterns of nutrient uptake at the whole-stream scale. We combined two techniques to examine nutrient limitation in a tropical stream. First, we conducted two NDS experiments using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the threshold of 32 for the N:P molar ratio to indicate phosphorus limitation (Kahlert, 1998), the disturbed sites at Santa Maria stream would be considered N-limited by this criterion, as their N:P ratio was 24.9 ± 0.14 1SE. This result supports other nutrient limitation studies carried out with NDS in Atlantic Forest streams (Lourenço-Amorim et al, 2014;Tromboni et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Considering the threshold of 32 for the N:P molar ratio to indicate phosphorus limitation (Kahlert, 1998), the disturbed sites at Santa Maria stream would be considered N-limited by this criterion, as their N:P ratio was 24.9 ± 0.14 1SE. This result supports other nutrient limitation studies carried out with NDS in Atlantic Forest streams (Lourenço-Amorim et al, 2014;Tromboni et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Ambient uptake metrics suggested that nutrient retention was lower in our agricultural sites than in low‐intensity agricultural sites, with statistically significant differences for Sw amb for NH 4 + and SRP (Figure a) and V famb for SRP (Figure c). In our study, the uptake metrics (longer Sw amb for NH 4 + and SRP and lower V famb for SRP) generally suggested low nutrient retention when compared with metrics reported for more pristine sites in the Brazilian Coastal Atlantic Forest (Tromboni et al, ; Tromboni et al, ) or even for chronically nutrient‐rich Pampean streams in Argentina (García et al, ). In general, lower nutrient uptake capacity in agricultural streams than in less impacted/pristine streams can be attributed to (a) saturation of the biological community (Bernot et al, ); (b) reduced hydrological complexity of the channel (Argerich, Martí, Sabater, Haggerty, & Ribot, ; Sheibley et al, ); (c) loss of riparian vegetation (Weigelhofer, ); (d) restricted hyporheic water exchange with the sediments (Macrae, English, Schiff, & Stone, ); and (e) reduced adsorption capacities of the sediments (Stutter & Lumsdon, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We speculate this could be related with the relatively high and stable temperatures and insolation throughout the year (see Boulton et al, ) in comparison with the streams reported by Hall et al (), which are mostly from the Northern Hemisphere. This would lead to more stable biological communities, as well as to possible differences in stoichiometry and nutrient limitation (e.g., Tromboni et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variability in N and P retention rates and efficiency has been associated with primary production [9][10][11], hydrology and stream geomorphology [12,13], carbon availability [14][15][16], and nutrient limitation and availability [11,[17][18][19]. Several studies have assessed how environmental concentration influences the uptake of a particular nutrient [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%