1969
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740201004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient elements in the herbage of white clover, red clover, lucerne and sainfoin

Abstract: White clover, red clover, lucerne and sainfoin were grown in the field, and the mineral composition and cation/anion balance of the herbage were determined on samples taken at advancing stages of growth on eight occasions from 29 April to 18 July.The elements which showed the greatest differences in content between species were calcium, sodium, and molybdenum. White clover was consistently higher than the other species in nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorine and molybdenum. Sainfoin was consistently and substantiall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For red clover, we found that Cu, Mo and Zn concentrations decreased with advancing phenological stage whereas Co, Fe, Mn and Ni concentrations were more stable over time. With regard to Mo and Mn, this is in agreement with earlier studies (Whitehead and Jones, ; Anke et al ., ) but for Co this contrasts with earlier findings (Whitehead and Jones, ; Bakken et al ., ). For the other micronutrients, previous results are less clear and suggest decreasing Fe, Ni, Zn (Anke et al ., ) or more stable concentrations of Cu, Fe, Zn (Whitehead and Jones, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For red clover, we found that Cu, Mo and Zn concentrations decreased with advancing phenological stage whereas Co, Fe, Mn and Ni concentrations were more stable over time. With regard to Mo and Mn, this is in agreement with earlier studies (Whitehead and Jones, ; Anke et al ., ) but for Co this contrasts with earlier findings (Whitehead and Jones, ; Bakken et al ., ). For the other micronutrients, previous results are less clear and suggest decreasing Fe, Ni, Zn (Anke et al ., ) or more stable concentrations of Cu, Fe, Zn (Whitehead and Jones, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…With regard to Mo and Mn, this is in agreement with earlier studies (Whitehead and Jones, ; Anke et al ., ) but for Co this contrasts with earlier findings (Whitehead and Jones, ; Bakken et al ., ). For the other micronutrients, previous results are less clear and suggest decreasing Fe, Ni, Zn (Anke et al ., ) or more stable concentrations of Cu, Fe, Zn (Whitehead and Jones, ). It is possible that the divergent results are due to differences in the proportions of stems, leaves and flowers in the plant samples analysed, as these were not reported in the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a rich source of N, Ca, Mg and K and although P content may be below the optimum for dairy cows it is likely to be satisfactory for growing cattle; Na and S contents tend to be poor (8,12,13,27,39). Cattle fed on dried grass plus red clover had greater intakes and higher liveweight gains than when fed on an all-grass diet (30).…”
Section: The Effect Of a Ryegrass Companion Grass And The Variety Of mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is a rich source of CP and of the minerals calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K), and although phosphorus (P) content may be below the optimum for high-yielding dairy cows, it is likely to be satisfactory for growing cattle; sodium (Na) and sulphur (S) contents tend to be poor (Davies, 1964;Davies et al, 1966;Davies et al, 1968;Kivimae, 1959;Whitehead and Jones, 1969). It is a rich source of CP and of the minerals calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K), and although phosphorus (P) content may be below the optimum for high-yielding dairy cows, it is likely to be satisfactory for growing cattle; sodium (Na) and sulphur (S) contents tend to be poor (Davies, 1964;Davies et al, 1966;Davies et al, 1968;Kivimae, 1959;Whitehead and Jones, 1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%