Nutrient dynamics in an alpine headwater stream: use of continuous water quality sensors to examine responses to wildfire and precipitation events

Abstract

Stream water quality can change substantively during diurnal cycles, discrete flow events, and seasonal time scales. In this study, we assessed event responses in surface water nutrient concentrations and biogeochemical parameters through the deployment of continuous water quality sensors from March to October 2011 in the East Fork Jemez River, located in northern New Mexico, USA. Events included two pre‐fire non‐monsoonal precipitation events in April, four post‐fire precipitation events in August and September (associated with monsoonal thunderstorms), and two post‐fire non‐monsoonal precipitation events in October. The six post‐fire events occurred after the Las Conchas wildfire burned a significant portion of the contributing watershed (36%) beginning in June 2011. Surface water nitrate (NO3N) concentrations increased by an average of 50% after pre‐fire and post‐fire non‐monsoonal precipitation events and were associated with small increases in turbidity (up to 15 NTU). Beginning 1 month after the start of the large regional wildfire, monsoonal precipitation events resulted in large multi‐day increases in dissolved NO3N (6 × background levels), dissolved phosphate (100 × background levels), specific conductance (5 × background levels), and turbidity (>100 × background levels). These periods also corresponded with substantial sags in dissolved oxygen (<4 mg l−1) and pH (<6.5). The short duration and rapid rates of change during many of these flow events, particularly following wildfire, highlight the importance of continuous water quality monitoring to quantify the timing and magnitude of event responses in streams and to examine large water quality excursions linked to catchment disturbance. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Biogeochemical Responses to Holocene Catchment‐Lake Dynamics in the Tasmanian World Heritage Area, Australia

“…Fires can drive substantial changes in terrestrial vegetation and landscape processes, such as soil alteration and erosion, which can mobilize nutrients from soils, consequently increasing nutrient loading into streams, rivers, lakes, and reservoirs (Lane et al, ; Moody & Martin, , ; Reneau et al, ; Sheridan et al, ; Sherson et al, ; Wilkinson et al, ). Fire can also affect soil chemistry by altering organic matter content, cation exchange capacity, pH, electrical conductivity, and nutrient concentration (e.g., Bixby et al, ; Cerrato et al, ; Fletcher et al, ; González‐Pérez et al, ; Knoepp et al, ; Kutiel & Inbar, ; Raison, ; Robinne et al, ).…”

Developing the First Operational Nutrient Observatory for Ecosystem, Climate, and Hazard Monitoring for NERACOOS

“…sensors (Cohen et al, 2013;Gilbert et al, 2013;Sherson, 2013). The Cycle-PO4 sensor has also been independently and objectively evaluated by the Alliance for Coastal Technologies (2009b) with favorable results.…”

Emerging Tools for Continuous Nutrient Monitoring Networks: Sensors Advancing Science and Water Resources Protection

“…However, ISE and wet-chemical sensors for ammonium and orthophosphate also have a history of use for in situ monitoring and research. Wet chemical orthophosphate sensors, in particular, show promise for quantifying high frequency changes in water quality in response to hydrologic and biological forcings (Cohen et al, 2013;Gilbert et al, 2013;Outram et al, 2014;Bowes et al, 2015;Sherson et al, 2015).…”