Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient database improvement project: Separable components and proximate composition of raw and cooked retail cuts from the beef loin and round

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total ash content was not significantly different ( P > 0.05) in the cuts considered and the mean value was 1.2%. This is consistent with previous studies in which the ash content was found to remain constant regardless of meat cut . Finally, cholesterol contents differed significantly ( P < 0.001) between the primal cuts under study and were highest in the KK cut (45.34 mg/100 g) and lowest in the TL cut (38.17 mg/100 g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total ash content was not significantly different ( P > 0.05) in the cuts considered and the mean value was 1.2%. This is consistent with previous studies in which the ash content was found to remain constant regardless of meat cut . Finally, cholesterol contents differed significantly ( P < 0.001) between the primal cuts under study and were highest in the KK cut (45.34 mg/100 g) and lowest in the TL cut (38.17 mg/100 g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with previous studies in which the ash content was found to remain constant regardless of meat cut. 21,27 Finally, cholesterol contents differed significantly (P < 0.001) between the primal cuts under study and were highest in the KK cut (45.34 mg/100 g) and lowest in the TL cut (38.17 mg/100 g). These differences may be due to the fact that oxidative muscles are richer in phospholipids (and in cellular membranes) than glycolytic muscles, resulting in higher cholesterol contents associated with this membrane.…”
Section: Proximate Compositionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, the crude fat content in the high BMS group was higher than that in the low BMS group. It was previously reported that protein content tended to decrease with an increased beef marbling grade (Hunt et al 2014;Acheson et al 2015;Jung et al 2016). Our results are in good agreement with these reports.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In order to provide accurate nutrition information to health professionals, the food industry, and consumers, the national Beef Checkoff Program and the USDA Agricultural Research Service have collaborated to conduct research resulting in updated nutrient composition data for beef retail cuts published in the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference [ 14 ]. To accurately obtain research samples representing beef retail cuts in the U.S., a rigorous nationally representative sampling protocol was developed by nutrition and meat scientists at three universities in collaboration with USDA Nutrient Data Laboratory statisticians [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive nutrient analysis was conducted on the raw and cooked composite samples for the retail beef cuts. This included analysis for total protein and amino acids, total fat and fatty acids, cholesterol, minerals such as iron, selenium, and zinc, as well as vitamins including retinol, B-vitamins, choline, vitamin D, and vitamin E. Validated nutrient analysis methods and quality control techniques were performed throughout the study to ensure accurate nutrient data, as has been previously described [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The results of this comprehensive nutrient analysis served to update the USDA’s National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%