1998
DOI: 10.1051/forest:19980702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient cycling in deciduous forest ecosystems of the Sierra de Gata mountains: nutrient supplies to the soil through both litter and throughfall

Abstract: -The present work fits into a general study on nutrient cycling in four Quercus pyrenaica oak forests and one Castanea sativa chestnut coppice located in the Sierra de Gata mountains (Central System, western Spain). The work consists of an estimation of bioelement supplies to the soil by the litter of these species and by throughfall from the canopy with a view to defining their role in the soil and, more generally, in ecosystem bioelement dynamics. It is concluded that the greatest differences between the oak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding oak litterfall rates, information is even more limited. The values obtained are below the scarce studies carried out in Spain (Gallardo et al, 1998;Pardo et al, 1997) with this almost endemic tree species, and slightly lower than results from a recent study of Quercus canariensis Willd., 1.5-1.6 Mg C ha -1 year -1 (Aponte et al, 2010). Our values are within the range of some studies made on evergreen Quercus ilex L in Spain (Bellot et al, 1992;Martin et al, 1996), but far below with results from Q. ilex in Central Italy (Bussotti et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding oak litterfall rates, information is even more limited. The values obtained are below the scarce studies carried out in Spain (Gallardo et al, 1998;Pardo et al, 1997) with this almost endemic tree species, and slightly lower than results from a recent study of Quercus canariensis Willd., 1.5-1.6 Mg C ha -1 year -1 (Aponte et al, 2010). Our values are within the range of some studies made on evergreen Quercus ilex L in Spain (Bellot et al, 1992;Martin et al, 1996), but far below with results from Q. ilex in Central Italy (Bussotti et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…It is somewhat surprising that in some studies it is reported that no-needles litterfall was negligible (Kavvadias et al, 2001;Roig et al, 2005). Oak leaves contributed to about 50% to total oak-derived litterfall, a much lower value than other studies on Q. pyrenaica (Gallardo et al, 1998), Q. ilex (Rapp et al, 1999) or Quercus robur L. (Díaz-Maroto and Vila-Lameiro, 2006;Hansen et al, 2009;Vesterdal et al, 2008). The only studies with similar relative contribution of leaves to total litterfall were those in which a high proportion of acorns was found (Callaway and Nadkarni, 1991;Díaz-Maroto and Vila-Lameiro, 2006), but that was not our case during the sampling period.…”
Section: Litterfall In the Ecotone Scots Pine -Pyrenean Oak 491mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the mono-specific S. humboldtiana forest, there is an evident late spring pattern and the litterfall production coincides with the end of the flooding phase (Neiff and Poi de Neiff, 1990;Zamboni and Aceñolaza, 2004). In these forests a phenological reaction of trees seem to occur in response to the flood pulse, which may have deep effects in the dynamics of biogeochemical cycles and, hence, in nutrient release toward the soil (Gallardo et al, 1998).…”
Section: Relationship Litterfall Production-river Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies regarding better knowledge of these forest ecosystems have been previously performed (e.g., [1,8,9,10]), mainly focused on biogeochemical cycles of nutrients. Gallardo et al [8] observed different values of Open Access *Correspondence: juanf.gallardo@csic.esproduction of these deciduous oak forests according to different areas; these differences seemed to be inversely related to the amount of annual rainfall, which caused differences in soil acidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%