Tropical Montane Cloud Forests 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511778384.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient cycling and nutrient limitation in tropical montane cloud forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The similar density of non‐herbivore caterpillars in both elevational zones was surprising, as we expected that mid‐elevational zones of montane rainforest might represent more suitable habitats for especially these guild. Here, dead organic matter shows a beneficial ratio between the decomposition rate and nutrient content, whereas at higher elevations nutrient content in litter might be too low to serve as an appropriate food source (Benner et al ., ; Werner & Homeier, ). However, this does not seem to affect the non‐herbivore caterpillar‐feeding guild associated with Chusquea .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar density of non‐herbivore caterpillars in both elevational zones was surprising, as we expected that mid‐elevational zones of montane rainforest might represent more suitable habitats for especially these guild. Here, dead organic matter shows a beneficial ratio between the decomposition rate and nutrient content, whereas at higher elevations nutrient content in litter might be too low to serve as an appropriate food source (Benner et al ., ; Werner & Homeier, ). However, this does not seem to affect the non‐herbivore caterpillar‐feeding guild associated with Chusquea .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables have been investigated in lowland tropical forests, but they have rarely been studied in tropical montane forests. Tropical montane forests typically maintain lower above-ground productivity, lower soil nutrient concentrations and slower nutrient turnover than tropical lowland forests (Bruijnzeel and Proctor 1995;Benner et al 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1993, Vitousek et al . 1994, Pendry & Proctor 1996, Kitayama & Aiba 2002), leading to larger soil N stocks in montane forests than in lowland forests (Bruijnzeel & Proctor 1995, Benner et al . in press). All else being equal, these soil N pools should accumulate to the point where even slow turnover of a large soil N pool is sufficient to supply the vegetation with adequate N, but the persistence of low N cycling and reduced foliar N suggests that N accumulation does not continue to this point in most montane forests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000, Carrillo et al . 2002), inputs via biological N fixation may be substantially lower (Benner et al . in press). Montane forests have few legumes and actinorhizal fixers, especially compared to lowland forests (Gentry 1995, Crews 1999), so symbiotic fixation by vegetation is probably not a major N input.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%