Nutrient Uptake and Cycling in Forest Ecosystems 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0455-5_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient content in Quercus ilex canopies: Seasonal and spatial variation within a catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the regular alternation between flooding and dry periods favours nutrient release from soil organic matter, allowing a rapid uptake by species. These results do not reveal the direct influence of site fertility, since for N and K, for example, there is a negative relation between soil content and mature leaf content, which is in contradiction with results of a study on a Mediterranean Quercus ilex forest [32] These authors attribute higher N and P concentrations in relation to higher soil content to a higher temperature and water availability which enhances microbial activity. In the flooded sites, the water and nutrient availability was improved.…”
Section: Mineral Nutrition Versus Fertility Of Soilcontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the regular alternation between flooding and dry periods favours nutrient release from soil organic matter, allowing a rapid uptake by species. These results do not reveal the direct influence of site fertility, since for N and K, for example, there is a negative relation between soil content and mature leaf content, which is in contradiction with results of a study on a Mediterranean Quercus ilex forest [32] These authors attribute higher N and P concentrations in relation to higher soil content to a higher temperature and water availability which enhances microbial activity. In the flooded sites, the water and nutrient availability was improved.…”
Section: Mineral Nutrition Versus Fertility Of Soilcontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Our results confirm that there is no direct effect of soil fertility on resorption [1], as already shown for nitrogen uptake. The difference in resorption could be attributed to the fluctuations in water level and consequently to the soil moisture availability which has been stressed as an important determinant of nutrient resorption efficiency by Aerts [1]: thus a higher resorption value was observed at sites with higher water availability [32]. However, the difference in soil humidity between the two types of sites are not very great (humidity around 45-50 %).…”
Section: Parameters Controlling Nutrient Resorptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liebl.). As far as the holm-oak is concerned, Bellot et al (1992), Rapp et al (1992) and Sabaté et al (1995) reported that leaves of sclerophyllous species from Mediterranean forests and maquis have a low concentration of N and P.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Leaf RE of mangroves is commonly high and can be as high as ∼95.36% for N and ∼82% for P (Lin et al 2010, Lovelock et al 2004. The response of nutrient resorption to nutrient availability has shown mixed results, including negative (Kobe et al 2005), positive (Sabaté et al 1995) and no response (Lin et al 2010). For example, a meta-analysis based on a global data set of perennial species (9703 observations at 306 sites from 508 publications) showed a negative relationship between nutrient availability and plant resorption efficiency (Kobe et al 2005, Yuan & Chen 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%