2020
DOI: 10.1071/an19472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient concentrations and profile of non-structural carbohydrates vary among different Brassica forages

Abstract: Context Brassica forages are used in times of seasonal shortage to fulfil nutritional requirements of beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep or pigs. Although brassicas have been reported with high concentrations of readily fermentable carbohydrate, details have not been fully described and there is little information about the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) profiles of Brassica forages. Aim The study was designed to evaluate nutrient concentrations, as well as NSC levels and constituents, of the main Brassica for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wheat middlings had more NDF content (34.97%) compared to bulb turnip (17.9%) and forage rape meals (18.6%), more starch (21.8%, 11.1%, and 15.9%, for wheat middlings, bulb turnip and forage rape meals, respectively) and less sugars (0%, 20.8%, and 14.6% for wheat middlings, bulb turnip, and forage rape meals, respectively). In experiment 2, wheat middlings (34.97%) and kale meal (33.4%) had considerably more NDF content compared to bulb swede meal (14.7%), whereas sugar content among is greater for bulb swede meal (37.0% of sugars, with 20.7% glucose and 14.6% fructose), followed by kale meal (16.1% of sugars, with 7.8% sucrose, 4.3% glucose, and 3.4% fructose) and wheat middlings without sugar concentration [ 11 , 26 ]. We expected to find differences in acceptability or preference among diets since pigs show a marked attraction for sweet ingredients [ 38 ] and thus, an increased consumption in short tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Wheat middlings had more NDF content (34.97%) compared to bulb turnip (17.9%) and forage rape meals (18.6%), more starch (21.8%, 11.1%, and 15.9%, for wheat middlings, bulb turnip and forage rape meals, respectively) and less sugars (0%, 20.8%, and 14.6% for wheat middlings, bulb turnip, and forage rape meals, respectively). In experiment 2, wheat middlings (34.97%) and kale meal (33.4%) had considerably more NDF content compared to bulb swede meal (14.7%), whereas sugar content among is greater for bulb swede meal (37.0% of sugars, with 20.7% glucose and 14.6% fructose), followed by kale meal (16.1% of sugars, with 7.8% sucrose, 4.3% glucose, and 3.4% fructose) and wheat middlings without sugar concentration [ 11 , 26 ]. We expected to find differences in acceptability or preference among diets since pigs show a marked attraction for sweet ingredients [ 38 ] and thus, an increased consumption in short tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the preference test, the diet with 15% of swede bulb was preferred over the diets with wheat middlings and kale. Swede have a greater concentration of glucose and fructose as compared to kale [ 11 ]. The sugar content may affect preferences creating a higher hedonic reaction in rats and pigs [ 23 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations