2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2018.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient concentrations and loadings in the St. Clair River–Detroit River Great Lakes Interconnecting Channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 18 ], as well as habitat variation [ 14 ], among sampling locations, are strong drivers of the spatial variation of the microbial communities. We did not measure abiotic parameters such as nutrient levels at our sampling locations; however, due to the connectivity of the two lakes by the Detroit River [ 19 ], the short distances among the sampling locations and the eutrophication of Lake Erie [ 5 ] and St. Clair [ 20 ], our sampling locations might have similar habitat features which consequently resulted in the little spatial variation of the BCCs in our study. The chao 1 index of CB was higher than other sampling sites, potentially due to presence of more greenhouse agriculture area and consequently higher bioavailability of nutrients; however, more studies are needed to address the influence of greenhouse agriculture area on BC diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 18 ], as well as habitat variation [ 14 ], among sampling locations, are strong drivers of the spatial variation of the microbial communities. We did not measure abiotic parameters such as nutrient levels at our sampling locations; however, due to the connectivity of the two lakes by the Detroit River [ 19 ], the short distances among the sampling locations and the eutrophication of Lake Erie [ 5 ] and St. Clair [ 20 ], our sampling locations might have similar habitat features which consequently resulted in the little spatial variation of the BCCs in our study. The chao 1 index of CB was higher than other sampling sites, potentially due to presence of more greenhouse agriculture area and consequently higher bioavailability of nutrients; however, more studies are needed to address the influence of greenhouse agriculture area on BC diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient loads from the St. Clair River and three major tributaries (Thames, Sydenham, and Clinton rivers) were calculated as in Scavia et al (2019), using daily concentrations averaged over 2013 to 2015, which compared well with estimates from other studies (e.g., Burniston et al, 2018). For all other tributaries, which are minor in terms of flow and nutrient loads, the concentrations were kept as those as in 2009 (Bocaniov & Scavia, 2018).…”
Section: Nutrient Loading Retention and Tributary-specific Nutrient Response Curves And Retention Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently been estimated that 58% of the TP load entering the Detroit River system comes from Lake Huron, much higher than earlier estimates. Using measured TP concentrations at the outlet of Lake Huron, Burniston et al estimated its load to be almost 3 times the previous estimates that were based on TP concentrations in the ultraoligotrophic Lake Huron. , They also showed that TP concentrations, especially particulate P, downstream in the St. Clair River were higher than upstream where Lake Huron enters, and that difference has increased over time. Because the concentration differences were not due to additional lateral loads to the river, , it has been suggested that the difference originates from episodic sediment resuspension in Lake Huron that is not captured at the upstream St. Clair River monitoring station.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%