2019
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient affinity, half-saturation constants and the cost of toxin production in dinoflagellates

Abstract: The two parameters of the Michaelis–Menten model, the maximum uptake rate and the half‐saturation constant, are not stochastically independent, and the half‐saturation constant is not a measure of nutrient affinity, as commonly assumed. Failure to realise their interdependence and mechanistic interpretation may lead to the emergence of false trade‐offs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure of experiments to demonstrate costs may be due to the fact that experimental assessments have often been done under resource-replete conditions, while costs may be more significant when resources are limited [7,20,[25][26][27]. The PST molecules are high in nitrogen with N:C ratio 4.6 times higher than average phytoplankton materials [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure of experiments to demonstrate costs may be due to the fact that experimental assessments have often been done under resource-replete conditions, while costs may be more significant when resources are limited [7,20,[25][26][27]. The PST molecules are high in nitrogen with N:C ratio 4.6 times higher than average phytoplankton materials [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors challenge the mechanistic meaning of the affinity constant ( K ) and argue that although measurements of K provide valuable experimental information about the affinity of the bacteria to a certain substrate, it does not have a strict mechanistic interpretation (Kiørboe & Andersen, 2019). Liu (2007) showed in his review that despite the many efforts of mechanistically defining K , no consensus has been reached and no intrinsic meaning can be attributed to the affinity constant of the Monod equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may confer a competitive advantage to non-toxic R. raciborskii rather than toxic ones due to the high cost of making CYN via a multienzyme complex (Neilan et al, 2013). The toxic strains may also have higher nutrient requirements than non-toxic ones due to the relatively high content of N in the molecular structures of the prominent cyanotoxins like MC and CYN (Vézie et al, 2002;Briand et al, 2012;Kiørboe and Andersen, 2019). Therefore, in nutrient-limited (sub)tropical reservoirs, non-toxic R. raciborskii always dominated in the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%