2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2009.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nusselt–Rayleigh number scaling for spherical shell Earth mantle simulation up to a Rayleigh number of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the result that <1∕3 brings into question results for 10.1002 normal stress modes where = 1∕3 is explicitly assumed for the convective zone [e.g., Foley et al, 2012;Valencia et al, 2007]. A value significantly smaller than 1/3 is in good agreement with various other studies with free-slip boundary conditions [e.g., Bercovici et al, 1989;Deschamps and Sotin, 2000, and references therein;Deschamps et al, 2010;Moore, 2008;Ratcliff et al, 1996;Sotin and Labrosse, 1999;Stamenković and Breuer, 2014;Wolstencroft et al, 2009;Yanagisawa and Yamagishi, 2005].…”
Section: The Limits Of Self-determined Boundary Layer Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the result that <1∕3 brings into question results for 10.1002 normal stress modes where = 1∕3 is explicitly assumed for the convective zone [e.g., Foley et al, 2012;Valencia et al, 2007]. A value significantly smaller than 1/3 is in good agreement with various other studies with free-slip boundary conditions [e.g., Bercovici et al, 1989;Deschamps and Sotin, 2000, and references therein;Deschamps et al, 2010;Moore, 2008;Ratcliff et al, 1996;Sotin and Labrosse, 1999;Stamenković and Breuer, 2014;Wolstencroft et al, 2009;Yanagisawa and Yamagishi, 2005].…”
Section: The Limits Of Self-determined Boundary Layer Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our 1-D scalings depends mainly on whether d = zz or d = zx but also on the thermal evolution parameters ( , , ): reasonable values for ( , , ) are 1∕5 < < 1∕3, 1∕3 < < 2∕3, and 0 < < 1∕6 and are in agreement with all 3-D an 2-D numerical simulations assuming reasonable mantle rock rheologies and theoretical constraints from evolution models for the Earth [e.g., Deschamps and Sotin, 2000, and references therein;Deschamps et al, 2010;Lenardic et al, 2006;Moore, 2008;Parmentier and Sotin, 2000;Ratcliff et al, 1996;Sotin and Labrosse, 1999;Stamenković and Breuer, 2014;Wolstencroft et al, 2009;Yanagisawa and Yamagishi, 2005;Zhong, 2005]. Values of much smaller than 1/5 or even negative [Korenaga, 2003] have not been confirmed by 2-D or 3-D numerical experiments to date, and as such, we did not explore them.…”
Section: A3 Model Parameters: ( )mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…11a, the Nusselt number is displayed as a function of the effective Rayleigh number, for the different configurations with constant viscosity. The exponent for the EB series is 0.2406 similar to the value of 0.24 found by Iwase and Honda (1997), but different to the value of 0.28 obtained by Bercovici et al, 1989 andWolstencroft et al, 2009 in the three-dimensional spherical shell. It is interesting that, by moving to the compressible convection with constant thermodynamic property this value changes slightly to the 0.23.…”
Section: Constantcontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Using these equations we investigated the form of layered mantle convection for varying Ra and P . The simulations were undertaken using a benchmarked version of TERRA (Baumgardner, 1985;Bunge et al, 1997;Davies and Davies, 2009), which is able to model very high Ra in spherical geometry (Wolstencroft et al, 2009) shows the constant thermal gradient of a purely conductive regime. The dashed line in Part (B) shows the whole mantle convection thermal structure, illustrating the large temperature gradients at its boundaries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%