Abstract:Problem-posing activities have been shown to motivate students' learning while promoting a multifaceted and interesting educational environment. Moreover, these activities enable students to be engaged in personal interpretations of their own mathematical thinking. The purpose of this study was to determine if using a handson learning intervention with multiple representations could improve students' problem-posing skills. The researchers examined the answers of the participants (n = 14) with the greatest incr… Show more
“…In these studies, it is seen that students who are not gifted have difficulties in posing problems; there are deficiencies in the expressions of the problems they pose, they do not use the language well in the problems they pose; and therefore the problems are not understood to solve them, and the understood ones do not match the procedure used in the solution (Arıkan & Ünal 2013;Can & Yıldız, 2021;Çarkçı, 2016Çarkçı, Kartal, 2017. Contrary to these results, there are also results showing that non-gifted students are successful in posing problems; the problems they pose are logical and solvable, but the problems that the students pose are similar to the problems they pose in the classroom with their teachers (Dölek & Çalışkan, 2018;Kwon & Capraro, 2021;Özçakır-Sümen, 2021). When the situations of gifted students and non-gifted students posing arithmetic problems are compared, it is seen that the problems posed by mathematically gifted students are, require different steps, contain different computational processes to solve, and contain higher numbers with different semantic relationships.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There seems to be a limited number of studies examining the problem posing skills of gifted secondary school students (Erdoğan & Gül, 2020;Manuel & Freiman, 2017) in the literature. It is seen that there are many studies examining the problem posing skills of non-gifted primary and secondary school students (Alzahrani, 2021;Bevan & Capraro, 2021;Bulut & Serin, 2020;Can & Yıldız, 2021;Dae-Hyun & Jinhee, 2010;Dölek & Caliskan, 2018;Kwon & Capraro, 2021;Özçakır-Sümen, 2021;Peng, Cao & Yu, 2021;Tertemiz, 2017;Yurtbakan & Aydoğdu-İskenderoğlu, 2020). The fact that there is only one study comparing the problem-posing skills of gifted and nongifted secondary school students (Espinoza, Lupiáñez & Segovia, 2016) and that the study did not compare the problem-posing skills of gifted and non-talented primary school students makes the study necessary.…”
The purpose of this study was to compare the problem posing skills of gifted and non-gifted primary school students. As a quantitative research method, relational survey model was used for the research. The participants who were selected by convenient sampling consisted of 24 gifted and 24 non-gifted students attending from East of Blacksea region of Turkey. The data in the study were collected with an open-ended problem posing test which was developed by the researchers. This test consisting of 3 situations requiring free, semi-structured and structured problem posing. The data were evaluated according to the problem posing test evaluation form which was developed by the researchers. At the end of the study; while there was no statistical significance between gifted and non-gifted primary school students in free and semi-structured problem posing, it was found that non-gifted primary school students were statistically significantly better than gifted primary school students in structured problem posing.
“…In these studies, it is seen that students who are not gifted have difficulties in posing problems; there are deficiencies in the expressions of the problems they pose, they do not use the language well in the problems they pose; and therefore the problems are not understood to solve them, and the understood ones do not match the procedure used in the solution (Arıkan & Ünal 2013;Can & Yıldız, 2021;Çarkçı, 2016Çarkçı, Kartal, 2017. Contrary to these results, there are also results showing that non-gifted students are successful in posing problems; the problems they pose are logical and solvable, but the problems that the students pose are similar to the problems they pose in the classroom with their teachers (Dölek & Çalışkan, 2018;Kwon & Capraro, 2021;Özçakır-Sümen, 2021). When the situations of gifted students and non-gifted students posing arithmetic problems are compared, it is seen that the problems posed by mathematically gifted students are, require different steps, contain different computational processes to solve, and contain higher numbers with different semantic relationships.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There seems to be a limited number of studies examining the problem posing skills of gifted secondary school students (Erdoğan & Gül, 2020;Manuel & Freiman, 2017) in the literature. It is seen that there are many studies examining the problem posing skills of non-gifted primary and secondary school students (Alzahrani, 2021;Bevan & Capraro, 2021;Bulut & Serin, 2020;Can & Yıldız, 2021;Dae-Hyun & Jinhee, 2010;Dölek & Caliskan, 2018;Kwon & Capraro, 2021;Özçakır-Sümen, 2021;Peng, Cao & Yu, 2021;Tertemiz, 2017;Yurtbakan & Aydoğdu-İskenderoğlu, 2020). The fact that there is only one study comparing the problem-posing skills of gifted and nongifted secondary school students (Espinoza, Lupiáñez & Segovia, 2016) and that the study did not compare the problem-posing skills of gifted and non-talented primary school students makes the study necessary.…”
The purpose of this study was to compare the problem posing skills of gifted and non-gifted primary school students. As a quantitative research method, relational survey model was used for the research. The participants who were selected by convenient sampling consisted of 24 gifted and 24 non-gifted students attending from East of Blacksea region of Turkey. The data in the study were collected with an open-ended problem posing test which was developed by the researchers. This test consisting of 3 situations requiring free, semi-structured and structured problem posing. The data were evaluated according to the problem posing test evaluation form which was developed by the researchers. At the end of the study; while there was no statistical significance between gifted and non-gifted primary school students in free and semi-structured problem posing, it was found that non-gifted primary school students were statistically significantly better than gifted primary school students in structured problem posing.
“…Representational ability is one of the student abilities used to help students understand ideas in mathematics (Kwon & Capraro, 2021). Students need mathematical representation abilities to understand mathematics and to construct abstract knowledge into concrete knowledge through logical thinking (Goldin, 2014).…”
Mathematical representation ability is very important for students, but many students still need to be able to solve mathematical problems with various mathematical representation abilities. This research is narrative research with a qualitative approach to describe the problems of students' mathematical representation abilities in terms of field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles on the set topic. A total of 4 students, based on the GEFT test and the results of the subject teacher's directions, tended to field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles. The instruments used in this study were the GEFT test, questions of representation ability, and interview guidelines. The results of the data analysis show that the mathematical representation abilities of students with a field-dependent cognitive style can represent with several models. In contrast, the mathematical representation abilities of students with a field-independent cognitive style can represent all indicators. Based on these conditions, in the learning process, the teacher can plan a differentiated lesson by paying attention to the differences in students' cognitive styles.
“…For this reason, teachers should design the mathematics course for students to participate in mathematics lessons actively. Problem posing is on the agenda as one of the activities that foster active learning (Kwon & Capraro, 2021). There are studies emphasizing the importance of posing problems in our country (Akay & Boz, 2010;Arıkan & Ünal, 2014;Dede & Yaman, 2005;Ev-Çimen & Yıldız, 2018;Kaba & Şengül, 2016;Kılıç, 2013).…”
This study aims to analyze the problem-posing skills of primary school mathematics teacher candidates with problem-posing experience and their views on problem posing. The case study, one of the qualitative studies, was used in the study. The study group is ten prospective elementary mathematics teachers who were selected using the purposive sampling method and are in their third year in the academic years 2020-2021 Teaching Mathematics in Primary Schools Major at a private university in Istanbul.The data collection process consists of two stages: 9 problem-posing drafts in total for performance evaluation prepared by examining the literature and obtaining an expert opinion and semi-structured interview forms with three questions. The participants were asked to pose problems on the subject of integers. The problems were evaluated and analyzed by the researchers and two mathematics teachers according to the problem-posing evaluation criteria developed by the researchers. As a result of the findings obtained in the performance determination phase of the study, it was determined that the participants posed more successful problems in the case of structured problem posing. It was determined that some of the problems were not problematic; they were prepared without paying attention to grammar rules, the sentences were not in a clear and logical framework that the middle school students could understand. The numbers were not used according to a certain logic pattern to make the problem solvable. Some problem situations were left unanswered. In the second stage of the study, the data obtained through semi-structured interviews with the primary school mathematics prospective teachers were analyzed using content analysis. In examining the research findings, the main issues are what the participants pay attention to in problem setting, whether they emphasize problem setting in the instructional process, whether problem setting is necessary for each student, and whether anxiety occurs in problem setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.