[Retracted] Nursing Teaching Curriculum Setting by Introducing Postcompetency Model under the Vision of Internet Informatization

Abstract

The nursing curriculum is to be modernized to improve the student’s skills in meeting the recent trends in medical and healthcare fields. The curriculum improvements are based on expert recommendations, authors, and informative data from different web sources. The challenging task is to improve the readability and understandability of the curriculum to real-time standards. Considering the above facts, this article introduces a refined curriculum with Internet information analysis (RC-IIA) method. The proposed method incorporates the distributed Internet, journal, and previous curriculum information within the active nursing syllabus. This prevents repetitions and less-informative content within the active curriculum. Besides, classification learning for knowledge-based representations is used within the curriculum to improve competency. Based on the refined information, a recommendation-based curriculum is preferred for varying information across different standards. The proposed analysis method relies on existing and distributed information across multiple curriculum providers for leveraging the visibility and prolonging the stealth of the nursing curriculum.

Nurses, non-nurse healthcare providers, and clients’ perspectives, encounters, and choices of nursing gender in Tanzania: a qualitative descriptive study

“…These shared qualities might have been obtained from their educations, which are well stipulated within nursing curricula. It is supported by previous literature denotes that nursing curricula contain different information to improve communication skills, teamwork, skills, attitude, and knowledge [ 42 ].…”

Retracted: Nursing Teaching Curriculum Setting by Introducing Postcompetency Model under the Vision of Internet Informatization

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”