Abstract:Computer-based virtual learning environments (CBVLEs) have attracted attention as a learning innovation that can foster students' self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Research on the instructional design regarding these aspects of learning in a virtual learning environment is rather piecemeal. This study investigates the instructional design of a CBVLE for mathematical medication learning by nursing students in vocational education. The instructional design was based on a task-centered approach, and student… Show more
“…These are usually either supplemented by technology or integrated into online environments. Further features that distinguish them from other CRs are adaptiveness and immediate feedback, a focus on collaboration, or the implementation of particular pedagogical approaches such as gamification or game-basedlearning (e.g., de Mooij et al, 2022), embodied learning (e.g., Duijzer et al, 2019), or problem-solving with realistic problems combined with simulation or Virtual Reality (e.g., Zwart et al, 2022). Some studies take instruction based on a specific CR as a starting point and analyze characteristics of the broader LE (e.g., Berlin & Cohen, 2020).…”
This survey describes the structure of the field of research on curriculum resources in mathematics education in the period from 2018 till 2023. Based on the procedures of a systematic review relevant literature was identified using Web of Science as a database. The included literature was analyzed and categorized according to the type of curriculum resource and the area of study. Seven areas of studies were identified: studies on the role of curriculum resources, content analysis, user studies, studies on the effects of curriculum resources, studies on curriculum resource design, curriculum resources as data, and reviews. The areas were further subdivided into different subcategories based on the research questions of the included papers. The findings show that research on mathematics textbooks is still predominant in the field. The most popular areas of research are content analysis, user studies, studies on design, and studies on effects. Emerging areas are research on students’ use of curriculum resources and the employment of user data from digital curriculum resources as data basis in mathematics education research.
“…These are usually either supplemented by technology or integrated into online environments. Further features that distinguish them from other CRs are adaptiveness and immediate feedback, a focus on collaboration, or the implementation of particular pedagogical approaches such as gamification or game-basedlearning (e.g., de Mooij et al, 2022), embodied learning (e.g., Duijzer et al, 2019), or problem-solving with realistic problems combined with simulation or Virtual Reality (e.g., Zwart et al, 2022). Some studies take instruction based on a specific CR as a starting point and analyze characteristics of the broader LE (e.g., Berlin & Cohen, 2020).…”
This survey describes the structure of the field of research on curriculum resources in mathematics education in the period from 2018 till 2023. Based on the procedures of a systematic review relevant literature was identified using Web of Science as a database. The included literature was analyzed and categorized according to the type of curriculum resource and the area of study. Seven areas of studies were identified: studies on the role of curriculum resources, content analysis, user studies, studies on the effects of curriculum resources, studies on curriculum resource design, curriculum resources as data, and reviews. The areas were further subdivided into different subcategories based on the research questions of the included papers. The findings show that research on mathematics textbooks is still predominant in the field. The most popular areas of research are content analysis, user studies, studies on design, and studies on effects. Emerging areas are research on students’ use of curriculum resources and the employment of user data from digital curriculum resources as data basis in mathematics education research.
BACKGROUND
Educators’ choices about how to design online instruction can influence learners’ motivation. To optimize learners’ motivation, educators must be capable of using effective motivational design strategies that target a breadth of motivational constructs (e.g., interest, confidence).
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and directed content analysis aimed to catalogue the motivational constructs that researchers have targeted in their experimental comparison studies of motivational design strategies for online instruction in health professions education. The authors sought to identify motivational constructs that have received attention in the field and those that are presently understudied, and thus should be the focus of future studies.
METHODS
Medline, Embase, Emcare, PsychINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science were searched from 1990 to August 2022. Studies were included if they compared online instructional design strategies intending to support a motivational construct (e.g., interest) or motivation in general, among learners in licensed health professions. Two team members independently screened and coded studies regarding the motivational theories that researchers used to inform their studies and the motivational constructs they targeted with their design strategies.
RESULTS
From 10,584 records, 46 studies were included. Researchers tested motivational design strategies intended to make instruction more interesting, enjoyable, and fun (n = 23) far more than they tested motivational designs intended to support extrinsic value (n = 9), confidence (n = 6), social connectedness (n = 4), or autonomy (n = 2). A focus on intrinsic value beliefs appeared to be driven by studies that were not informed by any theory of motivation.
CONCLUSIONS
Researchers in health professions education have primarily focused on motivating learners by making online instruction more interesting, enjoyable, and fun. We recommend that future research investigate motivational design strategies targeting other high-yield motivational constructs such as purpose, confidence, and autonomy. Such research would help to generate a broader tool-kit of strategies for educators to draw on to support learners’ motivation in online settings.
CLINICALTRIAL
PROSPERO registration number: #CRD42022359521
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.