Abstract:Objective: to validate the Nursing Intervention Classifications (NIC) for the diagnosis 'Risk of Impaired Skin Integrity' in patients at risk of pressure ulcers (PU). Method: the sample comprised 16 expert nurses. The data was collected with an instrument about the interventions and their definitions were scored on a Likert scale by the experts. The data was analyzed statistically, using the calculation of weighted averages (WA).
“…Within the NDs of NANDA-I (19) , it is understood that the Risk for impaired skin integrity is the one that better describes the patients' condition at PU risk, subsidizing the better lesion preventive care planning although it is not the more specific for this type of worsening (12) . For its better accuracy, the Braden Scale risk assessment instrument can be used (12)(13)(14)19,23) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its better accuracy, the Braden Scale risk assessment instrument can be used (12)(13)(14)19,23) . The prescribed cares to patients with this ND were majorly related to the PU prevention, for example to protect skin to avoid rupture, to moisturize skin, to inspect skin searching for hyperemic or ischemic points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires the patients' evaluation with risks identification for this type of lesion and, consequently, to implement nursing interventions (8,12) to prevent complications that can compromise their health status and quality of life. The identification of patients at PU risk is essential to implement preventive actions since the initial hospitalization moment until the discharge (12) . One of the most broadly used instruments by nurses to predict the PU risk is the Braden Scale (11,13) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the literature points nursing interventions as indicated to those patients (12,15) , it is observed a lack of studies that describes in the clinical practice the types of prescribed care in accordance with the ND designed to the patients with PU risk. Adding to that, most of the times nursing care is described without a standardized language as the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) (15)(16) .…”
Objective:To identify the nursing care prescribed for patients in risk for pressure ulcer (PU) and to compare those with the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) interventions. Method: Cross mapping study conducted in a university hospital. The sample was composed of 219 adult patients hospitalized in clinical and surgical units. The inclusion criteria were: score ≤ 13 in the Braden Scale and one of the nursing diagnoses, Self-Care deficit syndrome, Impaired physical mobility, Impaired tissue integrity, Impaired skin integrity, Risk for impaired skin integrity. The data were collected retrospectively in a nursing prescription system and statistically analyzed by crossed mapping. Result: It was identified 32 different nursing cares to prevent PU, mapped in 17 different NIC interventions, within them: Skin surveillance, Pressure ulcer prevention and Positioning. Conclusion: The cross mapping showed similarities between the prescribed nursing care and the NIC interventions.
“…Within the NDs of NANDA-I (19) , it is understood that the Risk for impaired skin integrity is the one that better describes the patients' condition at PU risk, subsidizing the better lesion preventive care planning although it is not the more specific for this type of worsening (12) . For its better accuracy, the Braden Scale risk assessment instrument can be used (12)(13)(14)19,23) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its better accuracy, the Braden Scale risk assessment instrument can be used (12)(13)(14)19,23) . The prescribed cares to patients with this ND were majorly related to the PU prevention, for example to protect skin to avoid rupture, to moisturize skin, to inspect skin searching for hyperemic or ischemic points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires the patients' evaluation with risks identification for this type of lesion and, consequently, to implement nursing interventions (8,12) to prevent complications that can compromise their health status and quality of life. The identification of patients at PU risk is essential to implement preventive actions since the initial hospitalization moment until the discharge (12) . One of the most broadly used instruments by nurses to predict the PU risk is the Braden Scale (11,13) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the literature points nursing interventions as indicated to those patients (12,15) , it is observed a lack of studies that describes in the clinical practice the types of prescribed care in accordance with the ND designed to the patients with PU risk. Adding to that, most of the times nursing care is described without a standardized language as the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) (15)(16) .…”
Objective:To identify the nursing care prescribed for patients in risk for pressure ulcer (PU) and to compare those with the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) interventions. Method: Cross mapping study conducted in a university hospital. The sample was composed of 219 adult patients hospitalized in clinical and surgical units. The inclusion criteria were: score ≤ 13 in the Braden Scale and one of the nursing diagnoses, Self-Care deficit syndrome, Impaired physical mobility, Impaired tissue integrity, Impaired skin integrity, Risk for impaired skin integrity. The data were collected retrospectively in a nursing prescription system and statistically analyzed by crossed mapping. Result: It was identified 32 different nursing cares to prevent PU, mapped in 17 different NIC interventions, within them: Skin surveillance, Pressure ulcer prevention and Positioning. Conclusion: The cross mapping showed similarities between the prescribed nursing care and the NIC interventions.
“…Systematic reviews of some predictive scales with various lists of risk factors can be found in Bóriková (2006) and Fúrová (2006). The foreign literature refers to substantially more scales for prediction of pressure ulcers; some authors have attempted to modify the existing scales (Lepistӧ et al, 2006;Pancorbo-Hidalgo et al, 2006;Bavaresco, Lucena, 2012;Hyun et al, 2014;Demarre et al, 2015;Kumari et al, 2015). The nursing diagnosis of at Risk of Pressure Ulcers 00249 was included in the international classification of nursing diagnoses, NANDA International for 2015-2017, as a potentially new nursing diagnosis in Domain 11 Safety/Protection -a Class 2 Physical Injury (NANDA International, 2014).…”
Aim: The aim of the study was content validation of the nursing diagnosis of at Risk of Impaired Skin Integrity by a sample of Slovak nurse-experts. It focuses on identifying the major risk factors in pressure ulcer development. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: The Diagnostic Content Validity Model designed by Fehring was used for validation of the nursing diagnosis; we used it to establish the significance of the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis of at Risk of Impaired Skin Integrity in relation to pressure ulcer development. Correlation analysis was used for evaluation of the relationships between the risk factors. The sample consisted of 126 nurse-experts in accordance with modified Fehring criteria. Results: Out of 23 items, the nurses rated nine as significant (the most frequently present) risk factors (the weighted scores are shown in brackets): physical immobilisation (0.92), skeletal prominence (0.9), imbalanced nutritional state (0.86), moisture (0.86), mechanical factors (e.g., shearing forces, pressure, restraint) (0.84), a Norton Scale score of 14 ≥ points (0.81), hyperthermia (0.81), excretions (0.77), and extremes of age (0.76). Statistically significant correlations, which are positive and range between 0.2 and 0.4, were found between some risk factors. The strongest correlations were found between moisture and mechanical factors (r = 0.4008) and moisture and physical immobilization (r = 0.3072). Conclusion: Using the DCV model, the experts identified nine significant risk factors which can be predictors of pressure ulcer development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.