Nursing intervention and smoking cessation: Meta-analysis update

Rice, Virginia Hill

doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.01.001

Cited by 50 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…5 Systematic reviews compared studies on the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in hospitalized smokers, and found that interventions significantly increased the likelihood of quitting. 6,7 One systematic review incorporating psychological smoking cessation interventions for cardiac patients found increased abstinence rates after 6 months. 8 Although cardiac patients have been supported in giving up smoking by such interventions, many of them remain unsuccessful at quitting.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk groups and predictors of short-term abstinence from smoking in patients with coronary heart disease

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk groups and predictors of short-term abstinence from smoking in patients with coronary heart disease

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A recent metaanalysis of nursing interventions for smoking cessation found modestly increased odds of quitting smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 95 1.22-1.51). These modest findings may be attributable to the fact that most of the interventions did not use "best practices," including NRT (Rice, 2006). However, the task force that developed the clinical practice guideline, Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: Clinical Practice Guidelines, estimated that the smoking cessation interventions by nonphysicians (dentists, health counselors, nurses, and pharmacists) were effective (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.3-2.1) (Fiore, Bailey, & Cohen, 2000).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Tobacco Intervention Training in Graduate Psychiatric Nursing Education Programs

Price

Jordan

Jeffrey

et al. 2008

J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Improvement of SC is also related with the type of provider; e.g. physicians nearly doubled SC in comparison to control [99,112,113], and this is also the case for nurses [99,114,115], psychologists [99] and trained health professionals [116]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental and Genomic Factors as well as Interventions Influencing Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review of Reviews and a Proposed Working Model

Viron¹,

Malats²,

Heyden³

et al. 2013

Public Health Genomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Smoking behaviour is a major public health problem worldwide. Several sources have confirmed the implication of genomic factors in smoking behaviour. These factors interact both with environmental factors and interventions to develop a certain behaviour. Objectives: Describing the environmental and genomic factors as well as the interventions influencing smoking cessation (SC) and developing a working model incorporating the different factors influencing SC were our main objectives. Methods: Two systematic reviews were conducted using articles in English from the Cochrane library, PubMed and HuGENet from January 2000 to September 2012: (1) a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and (2) a systematic review of original research for genomic factors. The proposed working model was developed by making use of previous models of SC and applying an iterative process of discussion and re-examination by the authors. Results: We confirmed the importance of the 4 main factors influencing SC: (1) environmental factors, (2) genomic factors, (3) gene-environment interactions, and (4) evidence-based interventions. The model demonstrates the complex network of factors influencing SC. Conclusion: The working model of SC proposed a global view of factors influencing SC, warranting future research in this area. Future testing of the model will consolidate the understanding of the different factors affecting SC and will help to improve interventions in this field.

show abstract

Nursing intervention and smoking cessation: Meta-analysis update

Cited by 50 publications

References 46 publications

Risk groups and predictors of short-term abstinence from smoking in patients with coronary heart disease

Risk groups and predictors of short-term abstinence from smoking in patients with coronary heart disease

Tobacco Intervention Training in Graduate Psychiatric Nursing Education Programs

Environmental and Genomic Factors as well as Interventions Influencing Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review of Reviews and a Proposed Working Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About