Nursing and midwifery education, regulation and workforce in Kenya: A scoping review

Abstract

AimTo explore contextual literature on nursing and midwifery education, regulation and workforce in Kenya to develop an understanding of the current state and inform opportunities to strengthen the nursing and midwifery professions.IntroductionKenya has yet to achieve the minimum nursing and midwifery workforce threshold, despite the exponential increase in population and epidemiologic disease transitions.BackgroundThere are glaring health gaps and inequities in sub‐Saharan African countries. Health systems are evolving into complex and costly utilities, increasing the demand for nurses and midwives. It is, therefore, necessary to re‐examine systems that educate, deploy and retain the nursing workforce, especially given the ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic and increase in non‐communicable diseases.MethodsThis scoping review was guided and reported following the PRISMA‐ScR guidelines. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Web of Science) were probed for relevant studies conducted in Kenya between 1963 and 2020. The search was supplemented using Google Scholar. Findings from selected studies were extracted and analysed thematically.ResultsOf the 238 retrieved studies, 37 were included in this review: 10 articles on nursing and midwifery education, 11 on regulation and 16 on the workforce.DiscussionThere have been changes in regulation and an increase in nursing and midwifery enrolment and graduates. However, maldistribution and shortage of nurses and midwives persist.ConclusionsKenya's nursing and midwifery professions have undergone significant changes to meet the demand for a skilled workforce. However, the shortage of qualified and specialised nurses and midwives persists. Moreover, this shortage is exacerbated by underinvestment, outmigration and a need for more reforms to expand the nursing and midwifery workforce.Implication for nursing and midwifery policyInvestment in nurse and midwifery education, mentorship and legislation is needed to build the capacity of the profession to provide quality health services. Several nursing and midwifery policy changes utilising a multipronged approach involving stakeholders’ collaboration are suggested to address the bottlenecks from education to deployment.

Developing a Tool to Assess the Impact of Simulated Intervention Strategies on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviours in Canada: A Dynamic Modelling & Machine Learning Approach

“…In dynamic, real-world scenarios, the underlying systems themselves are constantly evolving, necessitating a shift from static modeling approaches to adaptive models that can accurately reflect these changes [58][59][60]. This evolution is not only a characteristic of the systems we study but also a fundamental aspect of the modeling process itself [48].…”

Self-Perceived Evidence-Based Practice Competency and Associated Factors among Nurses at a County Referral Hospital in Kenya

“…However, research output by nurses as well as their involvement in the publication and dissemination of research findings in Kenya is low, limiting their ability to translate research into EBP (Nzengya et al, 2023). In addition, although there is progress towards EBP, challenges such as lack of research skills, limited access to upto-date research materials and related resources, and the influence of organizational culture are a barrier to EBP (Kimani & Gatimu, 2023) particularly in rural areas. Further, workload and staffing issues in some healthcare settings may limit the time nurses can devote to EBP activities (Nzengya et al, 2023).…”

Relationship between midwifery density and midwifery regulatory environments in International Confederation of Midwives member countries

“…However, limited evidence exists on this relationship in LMICs, where research mostly focuses on documenting midwifery workforce challenges and suggesting that improved regulation might alleviate these challenges, without exploration of the underlying mechanisms. For example, a scoping review in Kenya [20] and a descriptive review in Nigeria [21] effectively highlight how poor job satisfaction and low retention rates contribute to midwifery shortages, with the suggestion that weak regulatory environments may be a driving factor. However, similar to other LMIC-focused research, these studies lacked a quantitative analysis of associations between regulation and workforce, limiting actionable insights for policymakers.…”