1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01196.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurses' views of infection control: an interview study

Abstract: An interview study was conducted among 173 nurses in two hospitals to explore their views concerning infection risks to themselves and patients and to identify any problems they perceived in safely performing infection control precautions during routine activities. Subjects were interested in the topic of infection control and keen to perform optimally, but perceived difficulties related to lack of expert guidance whether or not they had access to an infection control nurse. In one hospital subjects identified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23] Previous data cite such issues as inadequate facilities, 24 lack of effective communication or knowledge, 20,25 and time 19 as perceived barriers to optimal hand hygiene practice. Our qualitative data suggest several additional barriers to adhering to infection control policies, including time, logistics (eg, room layout and placement of sinks), and lack of communication of infection control policies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23] Previous data cite such issues as inadequate facilities, 24 lack of effective communication or knowledge, 20,25 and time 19 as perceived barriers to optimal hand hygiene practice. Our qualitative data suggest several additional barriers to adhering to infection control policies, including time, logistics (eg, room layout and placement of sinks), and lack of communication of infection control policies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthcare workers non-compliance with hand washing guidelines has been well documented. Various reasons have been cited: insufficient time (Voss and Widmer, 1997, Gould and Ream, 1994, Larson and Killien, 1982, inaccessible hand washing supplies (Harris et al, 2000) and skin irritation (Larson and Kretzer, 1995;Zimakoff et al, 1992).…”
Section: Non-compliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many nurses believed that the products available for hand decontamination caused sore hands, supporting the findings of other authors. 34,35 However, supplies of products were generally considered to be satisfactory, a pleasing result which contradicts earlier findings. 34 This indicates that the recent publicity to increase hand hygiene in the UK 13 may be having a positive influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…34 This indicates that the recent publicity to increase hand hygiene in the UK 13 may be having a positive influence. As in this earlier study, 34 infection control was considered to be an important part of nursing care and attitudes were generally positive, although in both the previous 34 and present study, there were no relationships between opinions and hand decontamination performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%