Nurses’ self-reported smartphone use during clinical care

Planitz, Birgit; Sanderson, Penelope; Kipps, Tahli; Driver, Charles C.

doi:10.1177/1541931213571161

Cited by 7 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another recent and larger study of registered nurses in hospitals in the United States drew similar results, including concerns about distraction, safety, and policy as well as generational differences in the perception and use of mobile devices (McBride & LeVasseur, 2017). The study thus affirms many of the findings of previous and more recent studies on the topic (McBride & LeVasseur, 2017;Grabowsky, 2015;Planitz, Sanderson, Kipps, & Driver, 2013).…”

Section: Commentarysupporting

confidence: 79%

Nurses Need Training and Policies to Address Barriers to Use of Mobile Devices and Apps for Direct Patient Care in Hospital Settings

Wadson

2018

EBLIP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Review of: Giles-Smith, L., Spencer, A., Shaw, C., Porter, C., & Lobchuk, M. (2017). A study of the impact of an educational intervention on nurse attitudes and behaviours toward mobile device and application use in hospital settings. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada, 38(1), 12-29. doi: 10.5596/c17-003 Abstract Objective - To describe nurses’ usage of and attitudes toward mobile devices and apps and assess the impact of an educational intervention by hospital librarians and educators Design - Descriptive, cross-sectional survey, one-group pre- and post-test, and post-intervention focus group Setting - One 251-bed community hospital and one 554-bed tertiary care hospital in Winnipeg, Canada Subjects - 348 inpatient medical and surgical nurses Methods – The study had two phases. In Phase I, respondents completed a survey of 21 fixed and open-ended questions offered online or in print to a convenience sample from the community hospital and a random sample of medical and surgical units from the tertiary hospital. The survey collected demographic data and included questions about mobile devices and apps covering current awareness of hospital policy, ownership, internet access, usage patterns, concerns, and attitudes toward their use for direct patient care. It also included information to recruit volunteers for Phase II. In Phase II, participants attended four 30-minute educational sessions facilitated by the researchers. The first session addressed the regional health authority’s policies, Personal Health Information Act, and infection control practices. Subsequent sessions covered relevance, features, and training exercises for one or more selected apps. Participants installed five free or low-cost apps, which were chosen by the librarians and nurse educators, on their mobile devices: Medscape, Lab Tests Online, Lexicomp, Twitter, and Evernote. Participants were then given a two-month period to use the apps for patient care. Afterward, they completed the same survey from Phase I and their pre- and post-intervention responses were matched for comparative analysis. Phase II concluded with a one-hour audio-recorded focus group using ten open-ended questions to gather feedback on the impact of the educational sessions. Main Results – 94 nurses completed the Phase I survey for a response rate of 27%. Although 89 respondents reported owning a mobile device, less than half used them for patient care. Just under half the respondents were unsure if they were allowed to use mobile devices at work and a similar number answered that devices were not allowed. Two-thirds of respondents were unsure whether any institutional policies existed regarding mobile device use. Of the 16 participants that volunteered for Phase II, 14 completed the post-intervention survey and 6 attended the focus group. In comparison to the Phase I survey, post-intervention survey responses showed more awareness of institutional policies and increased concern about mobile devices causing distraction. In the Phase I survey, just over half of the nurses expressed a desire to use mobile devices in patient care. Four themes emerged from the survey’s qualitative responses in Phase I: (1) policy: nurses were unsure of institutional policy or experienced either disapproval or bans on mobile device use from management; (2) barriers to use, namely cost, potential damage to or loss of devices, infection control, and lack of familiarity with technology; (3) patient perceptions, including generational differences with younger patients seen as more accepting than older patients; and (4) nurse perceptions: most valued access to information but expressed concerns about distraction, undermining of professionalism, and use of technology. Qualitative responses in the Phase II survey and focus group also revealed four themes: (1) barriers: participants did not cite loss of device or infection control as concerns as in Phase I; (2) patient acceptance and non-acceptance: education and familiarity with mobile devices were noted as positive influential factors; (3) information need, accessibility, and convenience: nurses reported needing easy-to-use apps, particularly Lexicomp, and appreciated improved access to information; and (4) nurse behaviour and attitude: participants reported more time would be needed for changes to occur in these areas. Conclusion – The study found that although most nurses own mobile devices and express strong interest in using them for patient care, there are significant barriers including lack of clarity about institutional policies and concerns about infection control, risk of damage to personal devices, costs, lack of experience with the technology, distraction, and negative patient perceptions. To address these concerns, the authors recommend that hospital librarians and educators work together to offer training and advocate for improved communication and policies regarding use of mobile devices in hospital settings. Moreover, the study affirmed the benefits of using mobile devices and apps to support evidence-based practice, for example by providing access to reliable drug information. The authors conclude that additional research is needed to inform policy and develop strategies that hospital librarians and nurse educators can use to promote the most effective application of mobile technologies for patient care.

show abstract

Section: Commentarysupporting

confidence: 79%

Nurses Need Training and Policies to Address Barriers to Use of Mobile Devices and Apps for Direct Patient Care in Hospital Settings

Wadson

2018

EBLIP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Distractive effects of nurses’ personal mobile phones are thus not limited to its actual use (Cho & Lee, 2016; McBride et al., 2015; Planitz et al., 2013), which can be deduced by the unique explained variance of telepressure in workplace cognitive failure beyond controlling for key antecedents (i.e. personality traits, workload and actual mobile phone use).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Well-known antecedents in the literature of workplace cognitive failure were included as potential confounding variables in this research and were added in the regression analysis (e.g. Elfering, Grebner, & Dudan, 2011;Planitz et al, 2013). Neuroticism was measured with eight items from the neuroticism subscale of the Big Five Inventory (John & Srivastava, 1999).…”

Section: Control Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite the large and growing literature on nurses’ use of personal mobile phones (e.g. Cho & Lee, 2016; McBride, LeVasseur, & Li, 2015; Planitz, Sanderson, Kipps, & Drivers, 2013), little to no attention has been given to the distractive effects induced by the device's mere presence or related human cognitions in a healthcare context. Therefore, the intent of the present study was to investigate the direct effect of private life telepressure on workplace cognitive failure among hospital nurses and whether the presence of their personal mobile phone moderated this relationship (see Figure 1).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to traditional phone call and SMS text messaging, 85% of users report to be active daily on at least two social media or messaging platforms such as Facebook or WhatsApp (Vandendriessche & De Marez, 2019). Message‐based communication to spouse, family and friends have also found to be widespread in hospitals as many nurses prefer to stay connected with them during work hours (McBride et al., 2015; Planitz et al., 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Private life telepressure and workplace cognitive failure among hospital nurses: The moderating role of mobile phone presence

Cambier

Laethem

Vlerick

2020

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To examine whether the presence of a mobile phone has a moderating role in the relationship between nurses’ private life telepressure and workplace cognitive failure. Design Cross‐sectional quantitative study using self‐report questionnaires. Methods Data were collected between December 2019 – January 2020. In total, 849 Registered Nurses from three Belgian hospitals completed the online survey. Data were analysed with hierarchical regression analyses and simple slope tests. Results Overall, the positive relationship between private life telepressure and workplace cognitive failure was moderated by mobile phone presence. Specifically, the experience of private life telepressure did only relate to higher workplace cognitive failure when nurses kept their mobile phone nearby (i.e. in their pockets). Additional exploratory analyses revealed that this moderation effect only held among nurses in young adulthood and regardless of the notification settings of their mobile phone. Conclusions The present findings indicate the unintended risk of mobile phone presence at work as it relates to higher workplace cognitive failure in nurses who experience private life telepressure. Ensuring there are clear organizational policies and practises in place to store away personal belongings of healthcare personnel during work hours would therefore seem beneficial for hospitals. Impact Considering the increased presence of mobile phones nowadays, a more detailed understanding is necessary on how these devices might distract personnel in a healthcare setting. The present study gives further insight into this topic and shows that in particular nurses in young adulthood who experience telepressure towards personal messages report more cognitive failure when their personal mobile phones are present, even when they do not actually use these devices. This furnishes additional evidence in support of hospitals' formal policy to forbid personal mobile phones of healthcare personnel when at work.

show abstract