2019
DOI: 10.24198/jnc.v2i3.21374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurses’ Moral Distress in the Emergency Department

Abstract: The failure of nurses in taking action related to their moral beliefs makes nurses' moral comfort not achieved and affects their dissatisfaction in their work, perhaps it also can result in nurses' distress. The purpose of this study was to identify moral distress in the Emergency Department (ED) nurses. The study design used quantitative descriptive with a cross-sectional approach. the instrument used was the moral distress scale-revised (MDS-R) which measures the frequency and intensity of moral distress. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five ( Hou et al., 2021 ; Fernandez-Parsons et al., 2013 ; Trautmann et al., 2015 ; Zavotsky and Chan, 2016 ; Arinda et al., 2019 ) of the six studies describe processes of convenience sampling. Four of these studies were rated as weak due to a lack of clear reporting, ( Arinda et al., 2019 ) self-selection of participants, ( Trautmann et al., 2015 ; Zavotsky and Chan, 2016 ) or small sample sizes ( Fernandez-Parsons et al., 2013 ; Arinda et al., 2019 ) resulting in them being judged unlikely to be representative of the target population. The fifth study ( Hou et al., 2021 ) describes a clear process of sampling methods, recruitment, and informed consent with a large sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five ( Hou et al., 2021 ; Fernandez-Parsons et al., 2013 ; Trautmann et al., 2015 ; Zavotsky and Chan, 2016 ; Arinda et al., 2019 ) of the six studies describe processes of convenience sampling. Four of these studies were rated as weak due to a lack of clear reporting, ( Arinda et al., 2019 ) self-selection of participants, ( Trautmann et al., 2015 ; Zavotsky and Chan, 2016 ) or small sample sizes ( Fernandez-Parsons et al., 2013 ; Arinda et al., 2019 ) resulting in them being judged unlikely to be representative of the target population. The fifth study ( Hou et al., 2021 ) describes a clear process of sampling methods, recruitment, and informed consent with a large sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also concerning were the items scored as “can't tell” on the EPHPP tool, possibly indicating selective reporting in relation to methodologies and study characteristics, which may translate into reporting bias when viewing the results. It was similarly noted that there were reporting errors in one of the studies; ( Arinda et al., 2019 ) values for the intensity of moral distress presented in tables varied from values given in the text. Due to the unreliability of the reported data, it was decided to omit this study from data synthesis for this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many providers experienced moral distress when supporting patients experiencing IPV was impossible within their imperfect system. Moral distress is defined as a phenomenon in which institutional constraints make it nearly impossible to pursue the right course of action ( Widianti et al, 2019 ). Emergency providers were frequently disheartened when faced with the reality of inadequate services and follow-up for IPV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%