Abstract:Introduction: Shared governance (SG) is an organizational model that allows frontline nurses to have control over their daily work environment and nursing practice. Unit-based councils (UBC) are an important operational element of SG and its members are frontline nursing staff. Purpose and methods: The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on UBCs and SG, staff nurses' perceptions, and factors that influence their adoption and successful implementation. Results: Five major themes emerged from the l… Show more
“…The support of nurse leaders is vital for the work of the councils (Cox Sullivan et al, 2017;Gabel Speroni et al, 2021), but many times nurse leaders and personnel have different perceptions about what the meaning of the council is and how shared governance really is (Hamad & Kehyayan, 2018;Hess, 2011). Nurse managers are more often found to perceive that nurses are involved in decision-making (Choi, 2021;Hess, 2011) while nurses do not see any difference in governance and can be confused about the role of the councils (Hamad & Kehyayan, 2018). The current study set out to gain a deeper understanding about the lived experience of nurses working as unit practice council members.…”
Aim: This study aimed to describe nurses' experiences of working as members of unit practice councils.Background: Health care organisations worldwide want personnel to participate in decision-making. Unit practice councils promote unit-level decision-making over unit-specific issues. Despite extensive research on shared decision-making, few studies have examined the experiences of nurses serving as members of these councils.Methods: A descriptive qualitative study design was used with semi-structured interviews of 16 nurses in two clinics of a Finnish university hospital. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.Results: The analysis revealed two themes describing nurses' experiences as members of unit practice councils: (i) inchoate unit practice councils with insufficient allocated working time and (ii) partial empowerment of nurses through the organisation's evolving Magnet project.Conclusions: Unit practice councils in the studied organisations are inchoate and unable to effectively advance shared decision-making or support nurses' professional autonomy. In the future, the councils require constant support from all leadership levels of the organisation.Implications for Nursing Management: Sharing decision-making power could be a win-win situation where nurse leaders relinquishing power over certain matters gain time to immerse in wider issues. While acknowledging different organisational roles, there is room for trusting each other's professionality and respecting autonomous work.
“…The support of nurse leaders is vital for the work of the councils (Cox Sullivan et al, 2017;Gabel Speroni et al, 2021), but many times nurse leaders and personnel have different perceptions about what the meaning of the council is and how shared governance really is (Hamad & Kehyayan, 2018;Hess, 2011). Nurse managers are more often found to perceive that nurses are involved in decision-making (Choi, 2021;Hess, 2011) while nurses do not see any difference in governance and can be confused about the role of the councils (Hamad & Kehyayan, 2018). The current study set out to gain a deeper understanding about the lived experience of nurses working as unit practice council members.…”
Aim: This study aimed to describe nurses' experiences of working as members of unit practice councils.Background: Health care organisations worldwide want personnel to participate in decision-making. Unit practice councils promote unit-level decision-making over unit-specific issues. Despite extensive research on shared decision-making, few studies have examined the experiences of nurses serving as members of these councils.Methods: A descriptive qualitative study design was used with semi-structured interviews of 16 nurses in two clinics of a Finnish university hospital. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.Results: The analysis revealed two themes describing nurses' experiences as members of unit practice councils: (i) inchoate unit practice councils with insufficient allocated working time and (ii) partial empowerment of nurses through the organisation's evolving Magnet project.Conclusions: Unit practice councils in the studied organisations are inchoate and unable to effectively advance shared decision-making or support nurses' professional autonomy. In the future, the councils require constant support from all leadership levels of the organisation.Implications for Nursing Management: Sharing decision-making power could be a win-win situation where nurse leaders relinquishing power over certain matters gain time to immerse in wider issues. While acknowledging different organisational roles, there is room for trusting each other's professionality and respecting autonomous work.
“…Engaging nurses at the service point in raising clinical and operational issues is linked to greater levels of empowerment and confidence pertaining to shared governance and its related UPCs (Al‐Marri & Kehyayan, 2018 ; Brull, 2015 ). Implementation of professional governance structures can enhance the synergistic work environment between the management and frontline employees, and improve employee work conditions enhancing teamwork, open‐mindedness and the adventure of finding new solutions to old problems (Fuentes et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
A positive and healthy work environment is considered an essential and crucial component to increase nurses' satisfaction; therefore, nurses used shared governance and its related Unit Practice Councils (UPCs) as a way to attain it. UPCs are innovative management and leadership process built on shared decision-making among all nurses and focused on nurses' practices and accountability of their care (Lamoureux et al, 2014).Engaging nurses at the service point in raising clinical and operational issues is linked to greater levels of empowerment and confidence pertaining to shared governance and its related UPCs (Al-Marri & Kehyayan, 2018;Brull, 2015). Implementation of professional governance structures can enhance the synergistic work environment between the management and frontline employees, and improve employee work conditions enhancing teamwork, openmindedness and the adventure of finding new solutions to old problems (Fuentes et al, 2019).One of the ways to implement shared governance is through the creation and institutionalization of UPCs which are groups of nurses within units who take lead in implementing, monitoring, evaluating standard and consistent practice among staff nurses and the wider multidisciplinary team (Sloan, 2020).
A positive and healthy work environment is considered an essential and crucial component to increase nurses' satisfaction; therefore, nurses used shared governance and its related Unit Practice Councils (UPCs) as a way to attain it. UPCs are innovative management and leadership process built on shared decision-making among all nurses and focused on nurses' practices and accountability of their care (Lamoureux et al., 2014).Engaging nurses at the service point in raising clinical and operational issues is linked to greater levels of empowerment and confidence pertaining to shared governance and its related UPCs (Al-Marri & Kehyayan, 2018;Brull, 2015). Implementation of professional governance structures can enhance the synergistic work environment between the management and frontline employees, and improve employee work conditions enhancing teamwork, openmindedness and the adventure of finding new solutions to old problems (Fuentes et al., 2019).One of the ways to implement shared governance is through the creation and institutionalization of UPCs which are groups of nurses within units who take lead in implementing, monitoring, evaluating standard and consistent practice among staff nurses and the wider multidisciplinary team (Sloan, 2020). UPCs should be well-structured and functional, with nurses aligning themselves with self-directed work teams and organizational leaders' competencies (Joseph & Bogue, 2016). Optimal functioning of UPCs has been shown to result in nursing empowerment, improved clinical practice, a healthy work environment, improved peer relationships, cultural change, improved perceptions of patients and employees, and improved patient outcomes and satisfaction (Gerard et al., 2016;Wessel, 2012).
Aim
To investigate the relationships among structural empowerment, professional governance, autonomy and job satisfaction in the Korean nurses and to provide a more in‐depth explanation of the nature of professional governance as a process.
Background
Professional governance in nursing is a key component in the Magnet Recognition Program. However, little is known about professional governance in the Korean nursing.
Methods
A sequential, explanatory, mixed‐method study with the Korean nurses (n = 208).
Results
The quantitative findings showed that decision‐making among the Korean nurses fell on a continuum of professional governance directed by managers. The mediating effects of professional governance on the relationships between structural empowerment and autonomy and between structural empowerment and job satisfaction were significant. The qualitative findings described the inhibitors and facilitators of professional governance.
Conclusion
The findings of this study highlight the significance of professional governance in providing nurses with more control over nursing practice and patient care and in encouraging nurses’ involvement in organizational decision‐making.
Implications for Nursing Management
Health care organizations should establish internal policies that give nurses the power to voice their opinions on inpatient care, encourage unit managers to create a positive nursing work environment through support and recognition and have nurses set council activity goals based on their needs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.