University-based nurse educators introduce students to ideas that have their genesis in non-nursing disciplines (e.g. biology, ethics, pharmacology, philosophy, psychology, sociology, etc.). These ideas are, on occasion, transformed during or following migration into nursing.When this happens, while an idea may retain the same descriptor, the meaning it comes to carry in nursing no longer matches that assumed in the originating discipline. 'Phenomenology' might be an example of this. Arguably, in nursing, some forms of phenomenology either have or are becoming something other than identically named research and scholarship conducted outside nursing. Transformed or transforming ideas of this type are not discussed here. Instead, problems attending the use of ideas that continue to signal referents derived from nonnursing disciplines are explored. Specifically, it is proposed that when nurse educators use ideas obtained from non-nursing disciplines in teaching, if subject expertize is required to understand ideas at levels corresponding to or commensurate with university instruction, and if expertize is associated with accredited learning, where enlisted ideas maintain their original meanings (i.e. original according to the home discipline), nurse educators who lack first degrees in the subjects they take ideas from may use ideas in teaching they do not adequately comprehend. To make sense of this somewhat convoluted and tautological claim I draw on personal experience.
| THEN AND NOWA great deal of joy accompanied my student days. However, university life proved disappointing. By example, at some point we were introduced to Talcott Parsons' concept of the sick role. A hand goes up and a question is posed. At this distance I cannot remember what was asked. I do recall what followed. Our tutor became exasperated. She was reading off slides provided by someone else. She could not respond to inquiries about the content being delivered, and she was cross at being interrupted. This, I thought, was not education worthy of the name and since several people made excuses and left, others presumably reached the same conclusion.Jump forward 30 plus years. I now work in education and one of my colleagues is introducing first-year undergraduate students to the concept of holism. 1 That is, crudely, the idea that nurses need to consider more than the disease or physiological problem patients' 1 Neither key example employed in this paper identifies my current institution.