2015
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurses' attitudes towards professional containment methods used in psychiatric wards and perceptions of aggression in Turkey

Abstract: Aims and objective. The aim of this study was to determine nurses' attitudes towards professional containment methods and to explore the relationship between those attitudes and nurses' perception of aggression. Background. Different containment methods are used in psychiatric wards when patients behave aggressively towards others or exhibit self-harm. It is known that in addition to patient-specific and environmental influences, many factors related to the staff influence the choice of containment method. One… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study conducted in psychiatry wards in Turkey, the mean score of nurses' perceptions of functional aggression (2.95) was higher than our findings. In contrast, the mean score for dysfunctional (3.38) was lower [26]. Patients hospitalized in the Emergency Psychiatry ward usually demonstrate aggressive behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study conducted in psychiatry wards in Turkey, the mean score of nurses' perceptions of functional aggression (2.95) was higher than our findings. In contrast, the mean score for dysfunctional (3.38) was lower [26]. Patients hospitalized in the Emergency Psychiatry ward usually demonstrate aggressive behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The scale has two sub-dimensions. Functional (acceptable-healthy reaction) consists of 12 items (3,6,7,8,16,18,20,23,24,25,27,28) and 17 items if dysfunctional (unacceptable-unwanted aggression) (1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10,11,12,13,14,15,17,19,21,22,26,29). Average sub-dimensions are obtained by dividing the score obtained from the sub-dimension by the number of items in that sub-dimension.…”
Section: Perceptions Of Aggression Scale (Poas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En relación a la vivencia del profesional de enfermería frente a la contención mecánica y los factores que la influencian, es necesario incidir en el hecho de que el cuidado o abordaje a una persona en situación de agitación psicomotriz no se debe realizar en solitario (Chinchilla, 2011;Megias et al, 2016;Stucchi et al, 2014;Vieta et al, 2017). Las experiencias y la forma de obrar de cada uno está influenciada por la de sus propios compañeros y a la inversa, de este modo se crea la Ward culture (Keser et al, 2015;Korkeila et al, 2016) o cómo se podría traducir: la cultura de sala. Así pues una persona con menos experiencia, al incorporarse en el equipo emula las actitudes de compañeros más veteranos para poder acomodar sus propios valores y emociones (Cocho et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discusión Vivencia Del Profesional De Enfermería Respecto a unclassified
“…Esta cultura común ayuda a disminuir la disonancia cognitiva de los miembros del equipo (Cocho et al, 2018;Keser et al, 2015;Korkeila et al, 2016). Otro fenómeno que aparece en los equipos de enfermería que prestan servicios a personas con sufrimiento mental es el soporte emocional y el debriefing tras el uso de una medida coercitiva (Cocho et al, 2018;Sastre y Campaña, 2014).…”
Section: Discusión Vivencia Del Profesional De Enfermería Respecto a unclassified
“…There are three types of restraint typically used in acute mental health inpatient settings: physical, environmental, and chemical (Emmanuel et al, 2013;Keser Özcan et al, 2015;National Consumer and Carer Forum, 2009). Restraint use has been a common nursing practice in acute inpatient mental health care settings (Chieze et al, 2019;Garriga et al, 2016;Landeweer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%