2014
DOI: 10.1093/sf/sou051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurse or Mechanic? The Role of Parental Socialization and Children's Personality in the Formation of Sex-Typed Occupational Aspirations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, as analyses of specific fields of study showed, boys are more likely to enter science and engineering and less likely to choose fields such as health, biology, agriculture and veterinary, whereas for girls we find the opposite. This is in line with previous studies, which concluded that mothers in a non-traditional occupational field result in adolescents choosing non-traditional fields (Leppel et al, 2001;Støren & Arnesen, 2007;Polavieja & Platt, 2014). However, whereas these studies find this effect only for girls (Polavieja & Platt, 2014) or boys (Leppel et al, 2001;Støren & Arnesen, 2007), we conclude that the mother's occupation affects both boys' and girls' field of study.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More specifically, as analyses of specific fields of study showed, boys are more likely to enter science and engineering and less likely to choose fields such as health, biology, agriculture and veterinary, whereas for girls we find the opposite. This is in line with previous studies, which concluded that mothers in a non-traditional occupational field result in adolescents choosing non-traditional fields (Leppel et al, 2001;Støren & Arnesen, 2007;Polavieja & Platt, 2014). However, whereas these studies find this effect only for girls (Polavieja & Platt, 2014) or boys (Leppel et al, 2001;Støren & Arnesen, 2007), we conclude that the mother's occupation affects both boys' and girls' field of study.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in line with previous studies, which concluded that mothers in a non-traditional occupational field result in adolescents choosing non-traditional fields (Leppel et al, 2001;Støren & Arnesen, 2007;Polavieja & Platt, 2014). However, whereas these studies find this effect only for girls (Polavieja & Platt, 2014) or boys (Leppel et al, 2001;Støren & Arnesen, 2007), we conclude that the mother's occupation affects both boys' and girls' field of study.Contrary to the theory of sex-role learning, we find no evidence that it is more likely for boys to learn gender-role behaviour from their father and for girls to learn genderrole behaviour from their mother. Mother's occupation has a similar influence on boys and girls, and father's occupation has little effect on which field of study adolescents enter.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Field of study is a central indicator of pre-market segregation. Women may cluster in different fields because of gendered socialization (Polavieja and Platt, 2014) or because they anticipate part-time work and thus choose fields that lead to family friendly (and low-paid) occupations (Ochsenfeld, 2014: p. 537).…”
Section: Channels Through Which Family Roles Affect Wagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stratification studies of students' occupational expectations are consistent with the basic tenets of the gender socialisation hypothesis (Marks 2008a;Marks 2008b). In a sample of British adolescents born around the early 1980s, boys tended to aspire to male-dominated careers if their fathers had the same type of occupations, whereas girls tended to expect gender-atypical careers if their mothers were engaged in maledominated fields (Polavieja and Platt 2014…”
Section: Early Socialisation Influences From the Familymentioning
confidence: 99%