Nurse-led Telehealth Intervention for Rehabilitation (Telerehabilitation) Among Community-Dwelling Patients With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Chronic diseases are putting huge pressure on health care systems. Nurses are widely recognized as one of the competent health care providers who offer comprehensive care to patients during rehabilitation after hospitalization. In recent years, telerehabilitation has opened a new pathway for nurses to manage chronic diseases at a distance; however, it remains unclear which chronic disease patients benefit the most from this innovative delivery mode. Objective This study aims to summarize current components of community-based, nurse-led telerehabilitation programs using the chronic care model; evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led telerehabilitation programs compared with traditional face-to-face rehabilitation programs; and compare the effects of telerehabilitation on patients with different chronic diseases. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using 6 databases for articles published from 2015 to 2021. Studies comparing the effectiveness of telehealth rehabilitation with face-to-face rehabilitation for people with hypertension, cardiac diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes, cancer, or stroke were included. Quality of life was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included physical indicators, self-care, psychological impacts, and health-resource use. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials was employed to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and illustrated with forest plots. Results A total of 26 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Telephone follow-ups were the most commonly used telerehabilitation delivery approach. Chronic care model components, such as nurses-patient communication, self-management support, and regular follow-up, were involved in all telerehabilitation programs. Compared with traditional face-to-face rehabilitation groups, statistically significant improvements in quality of life (cardiac diseases: standard mean difference [SMD] 0.45; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.81; P=.01; heterogeneity: X21=1.9; I2=48%; P=.16; chronic respiratory diseases: SMD 0.18; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.31; P=.007; heterogeneity: X22=1.7; I2=0%; P=.43) and self-care (cardiac diseases: MD 5.49; 95% CI 2.95 to 8.03; P<.001; heterogeneity: X25=6.5; I2=23%; P=.26; diabetes: SMD 1.20; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.84; P<.001; heterogeneity: X24=46.3; I2=91%; P<.001) were observed in the groups that used telerehabilitation. For patients with any of the 6 targeted chronic diseases, those with hypertension and diabetes experienced significant improvements in their blood pressure (systolic blood pressure: MD 10.48; 95% CI 2.68 to 18.28; P=.008; heterogeneity: X21=2.2; I2=54%; P=0.14; diastolic blood pressure: MD 1.52; 95% CI –10.08 to 13.11, P=.80; heterogeneity: X21=11.5; I2=91%; P<.001), and hemoglobin A1c (MD 0.19; 95% CI –0.19 to 0.57 P=.32; heterogeneity: X24=12.4; I2=68%; P=.01) levels. Despite these positive findings, telerehabilitation was found to have no statistically significant effect on improving patients’ anxiety level, depression level, or hospital admission rate. Conclusions This review showed that telerehabilitation programs could be beneficial to patients with chronic disease in the community. However, better designed nurse-led telerehabilitation programs are needed, such as those involving the transfer of nurse-patient clinical data. The heterogeneity between studies was moderate to high. Future research could integrate the chronic care model with telerehabilitation to maximize its benefits for community-dwelling patients with chronic diseases. Trial Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022324676; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=324676

Acceptability of Tele-mental Health Services Among Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

“…It is also acceptable and feasible in diagnosis and treatment of Human Immune Deficiency Viral infection among adults [ 72 ]. Compared to face-to face rehabilitation services, tele-rehabilitation yielded statistically significant improvements in quality of life, chronic respiratory disease and selfcare among community-dwelling patients with chronic diseases [ 73 ]. A survey for assessment of feasibility, acceptability, and usability of telehealth visits revealed that, vast majority of respondents (98%) were comfortable with this services [ 74 ].…”

Engagement, Advance Care Planning, and Hospice Use in a Telephonic Nurse-Led Palliative Care Program for Persons Living with Advanced Cancer

“…Several have used interventions that were triggered by patient-reported symptoms via smartphone or web-based apps [ 8 , 28 ]. Looking at other populations, a meta-analysis of nurse-led telehealth for older adults and telerehabilitation reported improved overall quality of life, self-care, and chronic disease indicators [ 29 ]. These analyses reference a need for more research to explore which individuals may benefit the most as well as the optimal methods for delivery.…”

The role of nurse‐led telehealth interventions in bridging healthcare gaps and expanding access

“…Nurse‐led telehealth interventions surpass geographical barriers, allowing patients, especially those in remote or underserved areas, to access expert care without the need for extensive travel (Barton et al., 2023; Koh et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2022). For example, a recent systematic review highlights the latest evidence on nurse‐led telehealth interventions used to effectively reduce blood pressure and modify health behaviours among patients (Bulto et al., 2023).…”

“…Safeguarding patient information and complying with data protection regulations are critical to maintaining trust in telehealth services. Disparities in technology access and digital literacy may exclude certain populations from the benefits of nurse‐led telehealth interventions (Lee et al., 2022). Building rapport and trust remotely can be challenging, emphasizing the need for effective communication strategies.…”