Numérique et agriculture de précision

Bordes, Jean-Paul

doi:10.3917/re1.087.0087

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This method is thought to find potential improvements in the use of more efficient semiochemicals and trap designs for catching B. rufimanus (cf. AgriOdor researches), or in technological advances such as connected detection devices providing real time information of pest population to growers, which reduces the logistical burden of monitoring (Bordes, 2017).…”

Section: Standardization Of Semiochemical-based Monitoring Methods Fo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of Bruchus rufimanus Boheman 1833 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Biology, chemical ecology and semiochemical opportunities in integrated pest management programs

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Standardization Of Semiochemical-based Monitoring Methods Fo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of Bruchus rufimanus Boheman 1833 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Biology, chemical ecology and semiochemical opportunities in integrated pest management programs

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These relationships, too, influence the innovations in the sector. Land is primarily a physical platform for the practice of agriculture: while many technical and organizational changes directly concern ploughing of the soil and various types of movement over land (motorization, herd management, transport of harvests), the heterogeneity of space also comes into play in order to locate crops optimally or adapt practices, which is today one of the bases of innovations in precision agriculture [12] (Bordes, 2017). Development and management of the land is itself an area of innovation (terraces, reparcelling, drainage and irrigation systems) and has long formed one of the foundations of agricultural progress, promoted in France by the rural engineering corps.…”

Section: Innovations That Are Tied To Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation and development in agricultural and food systems

Faure¹,

Chiffoleau²,

Goulet³

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much more than a fashionable notion or buzzword, innovation has become a key issue for companies, policies and, more generally, society. In the Global North as in the Global South, innovating, i.e. introducing a novelty in an economic and social environment, appears more than ever as a factor of competitiveness for enterprises, leading to cost reductions, improved productivity or product quality, or the creation of new markets in a context of globalized competition (Porter and Heppelmann, 2014). In an extension of Schumpeter's (1934) work, innovation is more widely reaffirmed as a source of macroeconomic growth, at the heart now of a 'knowledge economy', deriving value from creativity, learning and communication (Foray, 2004; Stiglitz and Greenwald, 2014). It is also put forward as a solution to the problems generated by economic development itself, especially in the ecological, energy and food fields, leading to what Callon et al. (2015) call a regime of the economy of techno-scientific promises. Finally, across frontiers opened up by new technologies, in the digital and biotechnology fields for example, innovation is envisaged as the possible catalyst of a more radical social transformation, moving the world towards increased knowledge sharing (Rifkin, 2011), transhumanism (Ferry, 2016) and a break with the current forms of capitalism (Latouche, 2006). Of course, critical points of view question this craze for innovation (Godin and Vinck, 2017; Petit, 2015). Both creative and destructive, innovation can lead to social exclusion, destroy jobs and businesses, result in monopolies and misappropriations, and generate new technical and societal risks that need to be understood and addressed (Joly et al., 2015; Temple et al., 2018). But these critics often end up relying on the notion of innovation itself to suggest, or sometimes rehabilitate, alternative paths or avenues of resistance, for example through innovations qualified as 'social' or 'frugal'. Whether in the scientific, political, industrial arenas, or more broadly those of entrepreneurship and the media, innovation appears as a notion that is open to analysis, encouragement and criticism regarding societal changes. But it is also capable of underpinning the transformations of our contemporary societies. This primacy of innovation seems to have won over every corner of society, attracting attention, debate and engagement in all its economic sectors. It is in this context that this book presents contemporary perspectives on innovation in one of these sectors: agriculture and food. Several books and collection of studies have helped shed light on the issue of innovation in agriculture from different disciplinary and geographical perspectives (

show abstract

“…Au-delà de ce rapport à la nature, les activités agricoles conservent des liens à l'espace qui influencent les innovations du secteur. La terre reste d'abord largement un support physique au déploiement de l'agriculture : une partie des changements techniques ou organisationnels concernent directement le travail du sol et les déplacements (motorisation, gestion des troupeaux, transports des récoltes), mais prennent aussi en compte l'hétérogénéité de l'espace, pour localiser les cultures ou adapter les pratiques, qui est aujourd'hui un des fondements des innovations de l'agriculture de précision 1 (Bordes, 2017). L'aménagement foncier est d'ailleurs en soi un domaine d'innovation (terrasses, remembrement, systèmes de drainage ou d'irrigation) et a même été longtemps un des fondements du progrès agricole, promu, en France, par le corps du génie rural.…”

Section: Des Innovations Inscrites Dans L'espaceunclassified