1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19970228)24:4<355::aid-fld498>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Uncertainties in Transonic Flow Calculations for Aerofoils With Blunt Trailing Edges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the error estimate changes and must be less optimistic. A recent application of the GCI to airfoil calculations is given by Lotz et al (1995), which demonstrates the power of the method without the need for integer grid refinement and its application with solution-adaptive grids. Pelletier & Ignat (1995) have shown that the GCI is applicable, at least in a rough sense, to unstructured grid refinement.…”
Section: Richardson Extrapolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the error estimate changes and must be less optimistic. A recent application of the GCI to airfoil calculations is given by Lotz et al (1995), which demonstrates the power of the method without the need for integer grid refinement and its application with solution-adaptive grids. Pelletier & Ignat (1995) have shown that the GCI is applicable, at least in a rough sense, to unstructured grid refinement.…”
Section: Richardson Extrapolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual designs are under ongoing investigation by teams of students in capstone and graduate aircraft design courses at Rensselaer. These teams use a combination of structural analysis codes [14], computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools [15], and preliminary sizing and stability tools [16,17] to calculate take-off gross weight, performance, loads, basic structure, and stability for a number of different aircraft configurations that address the above goals. Reports are presented to the Advisory Board and include specifications for all major systems, for example, engine, fuel, controls, avionics, structure, cockpit, and payload plus a layout of all major components.…”
Section: Outcomes Of the Aircraft Studiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…error have commonly been used interchangeably [21][22][23][24]. It is believed, however, that failure to Validation, on the other hand, provides distinguish between these terms is detrimental to evidence that the right model is solved.…”
Section: Verification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%