2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical treatment of two-dimensional interfaces for acoustic and elastic waves

Abstract: We present a numerical method to take into account 2D arbitrary-shaped interfaces in classical finite-difference schemes, on a uniform Cartesian grid. This work extends the "Explicit Simplified Interface Method" (ESIM), previously proposed in 1D (2001, J. Comput. Phys. 168, pp. 227-248). The physical problem under study concerns the linear hyperbolic systems of acoustics and elastodynamics, with stationary interfaces. Our method maintains, near the interfaces, properties of the schemes in homogeneous medium, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grid step ∆x should be sufficiently small to model the geometry accurately. Note that alternative FDTD schemes which have been proposed to model explicitly curved boundaries [29,30] could be used advantageously to model QUS experiments. Finally, the method of coupling between the Rayleigh integral formulation and the FDTD assumes that the diffracting object inside the FDTD box is in the far field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid step ∆x should be sufficiently small to model the geometry accurately. Note that alternative FDTD schemes which have been proposed to model explicitly curved boundaries [29,30] could be used advantageously to model QUS experiments. Finally, the method of coupling between the Rayleigh integral formulation and the FDTD assumes that the diffracting object inside the FDTD box is in the far field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A less straightforward issue using pseudospectral differential operators is to model the freesurface boundary condition. While in finite-element methods the implementation of traction-free boundary conditions is natural -simply do not impose any constraint at the surface nodes -finitedifference and pseudospectral methods require a particular boundary treatment [14,23,25,26].…”
Section: The Pseudospectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore use least-squares interpolation to transfer cell-average information between the overlapping, curvilinear grids. Least-squares interpolation has also been used at block boundaries for embedded-boundary methods in [20,21] and for high-order coarse-fine mesh interpolation in AMR [25]. The methods of the present paper are applied in [26] to the solution of the shallow-water equations on the surface of a sphere, using AMR.…”
Section: Major Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%