2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijex.2017.083948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical thermodynamic analysis of heat storage porous duct under pulsating flow using lattice Boltzmann method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They advised a porous metal foam to optimize energy and exergy efficiencies while indicating that increasing the PPI for high porosity value mitigates energy losses for sensible heat systems and thereby increases the quality of stored energy. In another study, Amami et al [49] explored the charging and discharging process enhancement in a porous SHS duct held under a forced pulsating flow. They examined several porosities of the porous support while estimating its thermal performance.…”
Section: Sensible Heat Storage In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They advised a porous metal foam to optimize energy and exergy efficiencies while indicating that increasing the PPI for high porosity value mitigates energy losses for sensible heat systems and thereby increases the quality of stored energy. In another study, Amami et al [49] explored the charging and discharging process enhancement in a porous SHS duct held under a forced pulsating flow. They examined several porosities of the porous support while estimating its thermal performance.…”
Section: Sensible Heat Storage In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the involvement of open-cell metal foam can greatly enhance the thermal energy storage efficiency while shortening the melting time compared to a pure PCM. Amami et al [8] numerically investigated the thermodynamic behavior of a porous unit of sensible heat storage maintained under forced convective pulsating flow. They found that the exergy efficiency rate of the storage system is lower than the energy efficiency regardless of the parameters deemed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%