Observation, Prediction and Simulation of Phase Transitions in Complex Fluids 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0065-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Techniques to Study Complex Liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The local moves either act on intramolecular degrees of freedom (1-bond rotations, 2-bond rotations and 3-bond rotations) (108) or generate random displacements of selected atoms (32)(33)(34)(35). A variety of larger-scale MC moves have also been considered: the slithering snake or reptation move (108)(109)(110)(111), where one randomly cuts a bond from the end of a chain end and attempts to re-attach it to the other end; configurational bias moves [ (112)(113)(114)(115); for a review see (116)] where an entire section of a chain is cut and then randomly regrown; the pivot move (108,(117)(118)(119) used for single-chain simulations; concerted rotation moves around several bonds in a chain (120)(121)(122); and connectivity altering moves (123,124), in which a chain end attaches to a monomer on another chain, cutting off one of the two parts of the original chain. Another class of MC methods is defined through altering the thermodynamic ensemble for the simulation from the canonical one to, for example, a semi-grand-canonical ensemble (125)(126)(127)(128)(129), which is used for blend simulations and where the identity of a chain is switched to the other species pertaining to a probability given through a fixed chemical potential difference between the two species.…”
Section: Classical Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local moves either act on intramolecular degrees of freedom (1-bond rotations, 2-bond rotations and 3-bond rotations) (108) or generate random displacements of selected atoms (32)(33)(34)(35). A variety of larger-scale MC moves have also been considered: the slithering snake or reptation move (108)(109)(110)(111), where one randomly cuts a bond from the end of a chain end and attempts to re-attach it to the other end; configurational bias moves [ (112)(113)(114)(115); for a review see (116)] where an entire section of a chain is cut and then randomly regrown; the pivot move (108,(117)(118)(119) used for single-chain simulations; concerted rotation moves around several bonds in a chain (120)(121)(122); and connectivity altering moves (123,124), in which a chain end attaches to a monomer on another chain, cutting off one of the two parts of the original chain. Another class of MC methods is defined through altering the thermodynamic ensemble for the simulation from the canonical one to, for example, a semi-grand-canonical ensemble (125)(126)(127)(128)(129), which is used for blend simulations and where the identity of a chain is switched to the other species pertaining to a probability given through a fixed chemical potential difference between the two species.…”
Section: Classical Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many books and review articles dealing with MC techniques for condensed matter simulation, for example [33][34][35][36]; here we summarise the method in its simplest form, taking the canonical ensemble as an example. The aim is to calculate weighted averages over phase space of the form:…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Configuration bias Monte Carlo (CBMC) [35) attempts to overcome this problem by means of reptation-like moves, which traverse phase space more rapidly whilst still sampling the same ensemble.…”
Section: Versus MDmentioning
confidence: 99%