2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study on the transient behavior of water-entry supercavitating flow around a cylindrical projectile influenced by turbulent drag-reducing additives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14, the moment applied on the projectile produces the angular velocity of − 217 and − 28 rad/s at entry angles of 10° and 40°, respectively, and it can be deduced that the maximum absolute value of the projectile angular velocity ( |̇| max ) will be achieved after the projectile impacts with the water surface. Figures 17,18,19,20 show the projectile axial force, normal force, pitching moment and angular velocity at different entry angles. It is evident that as the entry angle decreases, the duration of the projectile's impact with the free surface increases and, therefore, the duration of the force and unstabilizing pitching moment applied to the projectile increases.…”
Section: The Sscc Projectile Dynamics At Two Entry Angles Of 10° and mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14, the moment applied on the projectile produces the angular velocity of − 217 and − 28 rad/s at entry angles of 10° and 40°, respectively, and it can be deduced that the maximum absolute value of the projectile angular velocity ( |̇| max ) will be achieved after the projectile impacts with the water surface. Figures 17,18,19,20 show the projectile axial force, normal force, pitching moment and angular velocity at different entry angles. It is evident that as the entry angle decreases, the duration of the projectile's impact with the free surface increases and, therefore, the duration of the force and unstabilizing pitching moment applied to the projectile increases.…”
Section: The Sscc Projectile Dynamics At Two Entry Angles Of 10° and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, main numerical studies on water entry concentrated on vertical entry. Jiang et al [18] simulated of the unsteady vertical water entry supercavitating projectile in viscous incompressible domain using ANSYS FLUENT CFD commercial code. It was obtained that the numerical simulation results are in good accuracy with experimental data and verifying the established numerical method procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Li's study, he recorded the trajectories of bullets projected into cetyltrimethyl ammonium chloride aqueous solution of different mass fraction by using highspeed CCD camera, and finally observed the supercavities configuration around bullets. Jiang [28,29,34] also conducted experimental and numerical study on the effects of drag-reducing additives on supercavities. In his investigation, he used cross-viscosity model to calculate the dynamic viscosity of the drag-reducing solution and then simulated the supercavities' behavior.…”
Section: Insteadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Truscott et al (2014) provided a review of the cavity formation, the depth and time of pinch-off, forces, and trajectories of the projectiles of different shapes and materials from the various experimental, theoretical, and numerical studies on low-speed water entry to high-speed ballistics. Jiang et al (2016) performed numerical simulations to study the transient behavior of waterentry supercavitating flow around a cylindrical projectile at different impact velocities in the presence of turbulent drag-reducing additives. They compared the cavity lengths, velocity attenuations, penetration distances, and drag coefficients for water and drag-reducing solution cases at high and low impact velocity cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%