2004
DOI: 10.1086/420760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study on the Rotational Collapse of Strongly Magnetized Cores of Massive Stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
95
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As we mention below, these studies are complimentary in the sense that the different epochs are focused on, with the different initial conditions for the numerical modeling being taken. In addition to the elaborate studies in the conventional supernova context (see recent reviews for Kotake et al 2006;Janka et al 2007), much attention has been paid recently to the roles of rapid rotation and magnetic fields for studying the formation of magnetars and its possible application to the collapsars (Yamada & Sawai 2004;Takiwaki et al 2004;Kotake et al 2004b;Sawai et al 2005;Matt et al 2006;Moiseenko et al 2006;Obergaulinger et al 2006;Nishimura et al 2006;Burrows et al 2007;Cerdá-Durán et al 2007;Scheidegger et al 2007;Komissarov & Barkov 2007). After the failed or weak explosion, the accretion to the central objects may lead to the formation of a BH (phase 2).…”
Section: No 2 2009 Srmhd Simulations Of Magnetically Dominated Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mention below, these studies are complimentary in the sense that the different epochs are focused on, with the different initial conditions for the numerical modeling being taken. In addition to the elaborate studies in the conventional supernova context (see recent reviews for Kotake et al 2006;Janka et al 2007), much attention has been paid recently to the roles of rapid rotation and magnetic fields for studying the formation of magnetars and its possible application to the collapsars (Yamada & Sawai 2004;Takiwaki et al 2004;Kotake et al 2004b;Sawai et al 2005;Matt et al 2006;Moiseenko et al 2006;Obergaulinger et al 2006;Nishimura et al 2006;Burrows et al 2007;Cerdá-Durán et al 2007;Scheidegger et al 2007;Komissarov & Barkov 2007). After the failed or weak explosion, the accretion to the central objects may lead to the formation of a BH (phase 2).…”
Section: No 2 2009 Srmhd Simulations Of Magnetically Dominated Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Core-collapse supernovae (CC-SNe) driven by rotation and magnetic fields, so-called magneto-rotational supernovae (MR-SNe), are a promising mechanism for several high-energy astronomical phenomena, e.g., magnetar formation, gravitational waves and hypernovae, and gamma-ray bursts (e.g., Yamada & Sawai 2004;Shibata et al 2006;Takiwaki et al 2009;Mösta et al 2014). Jet-like explosions in CCSNe are expected to eject very neutron-rich matter, appropriate for the r-process (e.g., Cameron 2003;Papish & Soker 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies of the past thirty years were either concerned with the collapse and bounce signal only (Müller 1982;Finn & Evans 1990;Mönchmeyer et al 1991;Yamada & Sato 1994;Zwerger & Müller 1997;Rampp et al 1998;Dimmelmeier et al 2001Dimmelmeier et al , 2002Kotake et al 2003;Shibata 2003;Shibata & Sekiguchi 2004;Ott et al 2004;Cerda-Duran et al 2005;Saijo 2005;Shibata & Sekiguchi 2005;Kotake et al 2006;Dimmelmeier et al 2007;Ott et al 2007;Dimmelmeier et al 2008), or were A&A 537, A63 (2012) restricted to axisymmetric (2D) models (Müller et al 2004;Ott et al 2006;Kotake et al 2007;Murphy et al 2009;Yakunin et al 2010). Several authors also investigated the influence of magnetic fields on the GW signal during the collapse and early post-bounce evolution assuming axisymmetry (Kotake et al 2004;Yamada & Sawai 2004;Kotake et al 2005;Obergaulinger et al 2006a,b) and no symmetry restriction at all (Scheidegger et al 2008(Scheidegger et al , 2010. The GW signal caused by aspherical neutrino emission was first studied by Epstein (1978) and subsequently by Burrows & Hayes (1996), Müller & Janka (1997), and Kotake et al (2007Kotake et al ( , 2009aKotake et al ( ,b, 2011, where the investigations by …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%