29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-3967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study on Supersonic Inlet Buzz Under Various Throttling Conditions and Fluid-Structure Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen, up to now no reliable prediction method of intake buzz has been developed through the analytical investigations. Therefore, numerical [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or experimental [8,13,23,25,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] methods are often used to study the buzz onset as well as its frequency and amplitude for various flow conditions. It seems that the work done by Trapier et al [18] is the most complete study among the numerical investigations because the flow separation is the key phenomenon in the buzz onset according to the Ferri [5] and Dailey [6] criteria, and to the authors' knowledge, this study is the only numerical investigation that uses the large-eddy simulation approach (detached-eddy simulation turbulence model) and three-dimensional grid to study buzz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen, up to now no reliable prediction method of intake buzz has been developed through the analytical investigations. Therefore, numerical [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or experimental [8,13,23,25,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] methods are often used to study the buzz onset as well as its frequency and amplitude for various flow conditions. It seems that the work done by Trapier et al [18] is the most complete study among the numerical investigations because the flow separation is the key phenomenon in the buzz onset according to the Ferri [5] and Dailey [6] criteria, and to the authors' knowledge, this study is the only numerical investigation that uses the large-eddy simulation approach (detached-eddy simulation turbulence model) and three-dimensional grid to study buzz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4a shows the evolution of total pressure recovery and internal compression ratio (ICR) with varying cowl internal angle θ c , in which ICR is defined as the area ratio of profile 2 to profile 3, as shown in Figure 1. Generally, a larger ICR tends to lead to enhanced compression ability but more easily allows inlet unstart [5,26], which results in serious damages for the whole engine [27][28][29][30][31]. It is clearly seen that, the variation curves of total pressure recovery and ICR are nearly overlapped in Figure 4a, showing a non-monotonic variation with θ c and reaching a peak value of about 77.8% for total pressure recovery and 2.75 for ICR at θ c = 10.53 • .…”
Section: The Influence Of the Limit Of Cowl Internal Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once throttling occurred, flow patterns were dramatically altered by the detachment vortex bubbles that formed on the external compression wall and inside the neck. Although the TR decreased, the dominant pressure disturbance rate increased, and the disturbance trend became more irregular, although its amplitude decreased in concentration [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%