2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study on polydisperse particle deposition in a compact heat exchanger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic nature of vortex shedding and deposition phenomenon led to a transient approach with a time step size equal to 10 -3 s which ensures a Courant number < 1. The model was developed using the Discrete Phase Model DPM in Fluent ® [21]. The Eulerian model describes the continuous phase and the Lagrangian model is used to describe particle trajectories.…”
Section: Geometry and Model Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic nature of vortex shedding and deposition phenomenon led to a transient approach with a time step size equal to 10 -3 s which ensures a Courant number < 1. The model was developed using the Discrete Phase Model DPM in Fluent ® [21]. The Eulerian model describes the continuous phase and the Lagrangian model is used to describe particle trajectories.…”
Section: Geometry and Model Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the period of time from 11 to 76 minutes, during which the heat exchanger was blown by a dusty air stream, the pressure drop doubled while the heat transfer decreased, but not significantly. Hosseini et al [25] studied the influence of dust particle size (1-1500 μm) and air flow velocity (1-5 m/s) on pressure drop. The authors found that an increase in the size and mass of dust particles contributes to an increase in pressure drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the discrete nature of the particle phase is inherently accounted for in the Eulerian–Lagrangian approach, which is unlike the Eulerian–Eulerian approach where fluid and particle phases are assumed to have thermal equilibrium and the particle phase is treated from an Eulerian perspective without description of the relevant micro-scale processes and particle trajectories. This translates into the capacity of the Eulerian–Lagrangian approach to accommodate such physical phenomena as particle size distribution (Kondaraju, Jin & Lee 2011), particle–particle interactions (Gorman & Sparrow 2018), particle–wall interactions (Baghdar Hosseini, Haghighi Khoshkhoo & Javadi Malabad 2017), non-spherical particle geometries (Liu et al. 2018), turbulent diffusion (Loth 2000), particle clustering (Breuer & Almohammed 2015) and flow with different particle types (Bhattad et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%