2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study on evolution of axisymmetric natural supercavitation influenced by turbulent drag-reducing additives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method is capable of accurately simulating the internal flow characteristics and the geometric shape of the cavity, producing results that are consistent with experimental results. Jiang et al [27] simulated the geometric shape of a ventilated cavity and the submarine drag characteristics, achieving agreement with experimental findings. Furthermore, they proposed a resistance reduction scheme based on the simulation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The method is capable of accurately simulating the internal flow characteristics and the geometric shape of the cavity, producing results that are consistent with experimental results. Jiang et al [27] simulated the geometric shape of a ventilated cavity and the submarine drag characteristics, achieving agreement with experimental findings. Furthermore, they proposed a resistance reduction scheme based on the simulation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The values of Re and We are determined by the viscosity and surface tension coefficients of the drag reducer solution. According to the experimental investigations of Jiang et al and Li et al, we know that the 200 ppm of CTAC (cetyltrimethylammonium chloride) solution has a zero shear viscosity of 0.005 Pa·s, a relaxation time of 0.08 s, and a surface tension coefficient of 0.0322 N/m. For a CTAC solution of 500 ppm, its zero shear viscosity is 0.008 Pa·s, relaxation time is 0.2 s, and surface tension coefficient is 0.0336 N/m.…”
Section: Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Li's study, he recorded the trajectories of bullets projected into cetyltrimethyl ammonium chloride aqueous solution of different mass fraction by using highspeed CCD camera, and finally observed the supercavities configuration around bullets. Jiang [28,29,34] also conducted experimental and numerical study on the effects of drag-reducing additives on supercavities. In his investigation, he used cross-viscosity model to calculate the dynamic viscosity of the drag-reducing solution and then simulated the supercavities' behavior.…”
Section: Insteadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional way of dealing with the viscosity factor is to introduce the changing dynamic viscosity and turbulent viscosity into the momentum conversation equation and k-ε equation. For example, the numerical simulation by Panov et al [27] of steady cavitating of viscous fluid in a Francis hydroturbine and the numerical study on the behavior of water-entry supercavitating flow around a cylindrical projectile influenced by turbulent drag-reducing additives by Jiang [28,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%