Abstract:Geosynthetic materials such as geogrid or geotextile are often used to compose a reinforced earth to improve the engineering properties of weak soils. These materials provide extra tensile resistance by interaction with surrounding soils. The geosynthetic materials have long been used to reinforce earth slopes, but relatively little study have been performed on their usage for the reinforcement of shallow foundation. In order to provide practice engineers with parameters to optimize their design, the effective… Show more
“…Therefore, the optimum burial depth is about 0.4 times footing width. This value is similar to previous numerical simulation performed by the authors (Lai et. al., 2014).…”
Section: Unreinforced Footingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In order to obtain a base line for the effectiveness of reinforcement and to verify the validity of the test results, two duplicate tests were performed on unreinforced dry sand prepared using the procedures stated in the previous section. Results of these tests were compared with numerical simulation performed previously (Lai et. al., 2014), and the ultimate bearing capacity, q u , was also compared with value calculated using Terzaghi's Equation:…”
Section: Unreinforced Footingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide the practice engineers with parameters that can optimize their design of reinforced shallow foundations, the effects of reinforcement length, burial depth, number of layers and distance between layers on the bearing capacity of a strip footing were studied numerically in the previous paper by the authors (Lai et. al., 2014).…”
Laboratory sand box tests were performed in this study to investigate the improvement in bearing capacity of a strip footing reinforced with woven geotextile in dry sand. The test cell is 0.9m wide, 0.9m long and 1.0m high. A hydraulic loading system was used to apply the normal force to a 0.85m × 0.1m × 0.05m (length × width × height) strip footing. The unreinforced bearing capacity was obtained and compared with value calculated using Terzaghi's equation. Various parameters such as: burial depth, length of reinforcement, number of layers and distance between layers were varied to investigate their effects on the bearing capacity. Results of these tests indicate that the optimum burial depth of reinforcement is about 0.4 times the width of footing, with a bearing capacity ratio (BCR) of about 1.67. The optimum reinforcement length is about 3~4 times the width of footing with a BCR value of 1.81. The improvements in bearing capacity obtained from laboratory testing are in accord with previous numerical simulation. However, the loading behaviors are quite different due to the failure mechanism assumed in the numerical simulation.
“…Therefore, the optimum burial depth is about 0.4 times footing width. This value is similar to previous numerical simulation performed by the authors (Lai et. al., 2014).…”
Section: Unreinforced Footingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In order to obtain a base line for the effectiveness of reinforcement and to verify the validity of the test results, two duplicate tests were performed on unreinforced dry sand prepared using the procedures stated in the previous section. Results of these tests were compared with numerical simulation performed previously (Lai et. al., 2014), and the ultimate bearing capacity, q u , was also compared with value calculated using Terzaghi's Equation:…”
Section: Unreinforced Footingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide the practice engineers with parameters that can optimize their design of reinforced shallow foundations, the effects of reinforcement length, burial depth, number of layers and distance between layers on the bearing capacity of a strip footing were studied numerically in the previous paper by the authors (Lai et. al., 2014).…”
Laboratory sand box tests were performed in this study to investigate the improvement in bearing capacity of a strip footing reinforced with woven geotextile in dry sand. The test cell is 0.9m wide, 0.9m long and 1.0m high. A hydraulic loading system was used to apply the normal force to a 0.85m × 0.1m × 0.05m (length × width × height) strip footing. The unreinforced bearing capacity was obtained and compared with value calculated using Terzaghi's equation. Various parameters such as: burial depth, length of reinforcement, number of layers and distance between layers were varied to investigate their effects on the bearing capacity. Results of these tests indicate that the optimum burial depth of reinforcement is about 0.4 times the width of footing, with a bearing capacity ratio (BCR) of about 1.67. The optimum reinforcement length is about 3~4 times the width of footing with a BCR value of 1.81. The improvements in bearing capacity obtained from laboratory testing are in accord with previous numerical simulation. However, the loading behaviors are quite different due to the failure mechanism assumed in the numerical simulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.