2014
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/27/9/2177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of the semiclassical limit of the Davey–Stewartson II equations

Abstract: Abstract. We present the first detailed numerical study of the semiclassical limit of the Davey-Stewartson II equations both for the focusing and the defocusing variant. We concentrate on rapidly decreasing initial data with a single hump. The formal limit of these equations for vanishing semiclassical parameter , the semiclassical equations, are numerically integrated up to the formation of a shock. The use of parallelized algorithms allows to determine the critical time tc and the critical solution for these… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
51
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(169 reference statements)
9
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulations show that similar phemonena also occur in 2 + 1 systems such as (1); see Figure 1. [19]. Observe that as decreases, the four lens-shaped regions that appear to confine the O( )-wavelength oscillations become better defined in the (x, y)plane for fixed t = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Numerical simulations show that similar phemonena also occur in 2 + 1 systems such as (1); see Figure 1. [19]. Observe that as decreases, the four lens-shaped regions that appear to confine the O( )-wavelength oscillations become better defined in the (x, y)plane for fixed t = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…If one is interested in the solution to the DS II equation for localized initial data varying on length scales of order 1/ε, and this for times of order 1/ε with ε1, one way to treat this is a change of coordinates xεx, yεy, and tεt. For , this leads to the equation (in an abuse of notation we use the same symbols as before) iεtψ+ε2xxψε2yyψ2()Φ+|ψ|2ψ-0.16em=-0.16em0,xxnormalΦ+yynormalΦ+2xxfalse|ψfalse|2-0.16em=-0.16em0.Thus, it is possible to consider a family of equations (depending on the parameter ε) for ε‐dependent initial data, which allows us to study the semiclassical limit of DS II (see for instance ).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , this approach was discussed with considerably higher resolution in detail and used to quantitatively identify the time where the distance δ of the singularity from the real axis becomes smaller than the minimal resolved distance via Fourier methods, i.e., m:=2πD/N with NN being the number of Fourier modes and 2πD the length of the computational domain in physical space. A value of δ<m cannot be distinguished numerically from 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the solution for the potential (23) for = 1/128 and k = 1, we use N x = 2 9 and N y = 2 10 Fourier modes and L x = 2, L y = 1. The solution can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Solution Via Gmresmentioning
confidence: 99%