2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-9746(02)00149-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of incompressible flow about fixed cylinder pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
63
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In figure 1 the variation of the Strouhal number (St= f c / V ) with the distance between two normal flat plates is reported; here f is the frequency associated to the main peak in the power spectrum of the HWA signal and V is the free Regular Paper stream velocity; Strouhal numbers will be presented in terms of their ratio to the single plate Strouhal number, Stref, for convenience. As for other bluff bodies (Liu and Chen, 2002;Jester and Kallinderis, 2003), also in this case hysteresis or bistability is observed for intermediate distances.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In figure 1 the variation of the Strouhal number (St= f c / V ) with the distance between two normal flat plates is reported; here f is the frequency associated to the main peak in the power spectrum of the HWA signal and V is the free Regular Paper stream velocity; Strouhal numbers will be presented in terms of their ratio to the single plate Strouhal number, Stref, for convenience. As for other bluff bodies (Liu and Chen, 2002;Jester and Kallinderis, 2003), also in this case hysteresis or bistability is observed for intermediate distances.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Liu & Chen (2002) showed that this phenomenon occurs for a pair of square cylinders in tandem and Zdravkovich (1977) suggested this possibility may occur for circular cylinders. Additionally, numerical studies performed by Jester & Kallinderis (2003) for Re = 10 3 , Papaioannou et al (2006) for Re = 10 2 -10 3 and Carmo, Meneghini & Sherwin (2010a,b) for Re = 500 also provide a clear demonstration of the hysteresis of both regimes in relation to Re and x 0 . All these aforementioned factors may cause the critical separation to present considerable variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The simple two cylinders configuration has been discussed extensively and it represents a starting point to study the flow around multiple bluff bodies (Ben Meftah and Mossa 2013, Chan et al 2011, Jester and Kallinderis 2003, Prasanth and Mittal 2009, S. Mittal and Kumar 2001, Sharman et al 2005, Sumner et al 2000. According to the literature, a well-known drag inversion separation has been identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spacing larger than the drag inversion separation makes positive the downstream cylinder drag coefficient and a vortex shedding in the gap between the cylinders appears. This flow is induced by the influence of both the cylinders and it is called wake interference (Jester and Kallinderis 2003). Sharman et al 2005 studied numerically the flow around two tandem circular cylinders at Re = 100 for the spacing ratio between 2 and 10 finding the drag transition between 3.75 and 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%