2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of hypersonic surface heat flux with different air species models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific steps are: (1) The material is processed into 2×4×22 mm 3 are evenly and densely distributed no matter inside or between the fiber bundles. After multiple infiltration-curing-pyrolysis cycles, the original morphology of z-direction carbon fibers is well preserved, indicating that the low-temperature and pressureless preparation method does not change the structural properties of the z-direction carbon fiber bundle of the braid instead of traditional dozens of impregnation and pyrolysis at temperatures over 1500 °C and hot-pressing sintering.…”
Section: Characterization-fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific steps are: (1) The material is processed into 2×4×22 mm 3 are evenly and densely distributed no matter inside or between the fiber bundles. After multiple infiltration-curing-pyrolysis cycles, the original morphology of z-direction carbon fibers is well preserved, indicating that the low-temperature and pressureless preparation method does not change the structural properties of the z-direction carbon fiber bundle of the braid instead of traditional dozens of impregnation and pyrolysis at temperatures over 1500 °C and hot-pressing sintering.…”
Section: Characterization-fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dong et al [14] used the Dunn-Kang 5-species, 7-species, 11-species chemical reaction models and one-temperature, two-temperature thermodynamic models to solve the thermochemical nonequilibrium flow, respectively, and found that the differences between the heat flux distributions predicted by the 7-and 11-species was not significant, while the heat flux of the 5-species was smaller, with a difference up to 10% or even more; the heat fluxes calculated by different thermodynamic models are slightly different, with a maximum difference of about 10%. Zhao et al [15] compared the aerodynamic heat fluxes under the Gupta 5-, 7-, 11-species chemical reaction models and found that the wall heat fluxes under the 7-and 11-species were significantly larger than that of the 5-species when the Mach number was greater than 12, and that the 7-species model should be adopted. Dobrov et al [16] used the Gupta 5-species and Park 5-species chemical kinetic models to solve the nearly same results of the air compositions at the stagnation point of a sphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%