2018 Joint Propulsion Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-4593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study of Fuel Regression in Hybrid Rocket Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be specially significant for rich fuel mixtures (weak oxidizer mass fluxes), when soot production is important. Radiation contribution has been observed to produce an increase in v r going from 5 to 10% in experiments [54] to 35% [33] in CFD codes for different couples and mass flow values. e) The specified thermophysical properties of the solid propellant, such as density, specific heat, depolymerization enthalpy of the fuel or even the coefficients used in the Arrhenius law.…”
Section: Error Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be specially significant for rich fuel mixtures (weak oxidizer mass fluxes), when soot production is important. Radiation contribution has been observed to produce an increase in v r going from 5 to 10% in experiments [54] to 35% [33] in CFD codes for different couples and mass flow values. e) The specified thermophysical properties of the solid propellant, such as density, specific heat, depolymerization enthalpy of the fuel or even the coefficients used in the Arrhenius law.…”
Section: Error Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The most used numerical approach in the literature is based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations employing different sub-models [6], which either rely on a prescribed fuel mass flow rate [9][10][11][12][13] or employ a parametric gassurface interaction model [14,15]. Radiation effects on the regression rate, which can be important in HRE operating conditions [16][17][18][19], are also usually neglected when dealing with paraffin-based engines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RANS simulations tipically rely either on the assignment of a prescribed fuel mass flow rate [11][12][13][14][15], or employ a parametric gas-surface interaction model, i.e., tuned to match one experimental firing test [16,17]. All previous numerical studies dealing with paraffin-wax neglect radiation effects, which can be prominent in HRE combustion chambers [18][19][20], and, in addition, neglect its thermal cracking reaction by directly injecting ethylene from the fuel grain surface to the flow field. One open challenge is the ability to predict the internal ballistic of paraffin-based HREs without compromising the simplicity and inclusiveness of the model strategy, and without tuning to experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%