2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3557794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of DNA-functionalized microparticles and nanoparticles: Explicit pair potentials and their implications for phase behavior

Abstract: DNA-coated colloids have great potential for the design of complex self-assembling materials. In order to predict the structures that will form, knowledge of the interactions between DNA-functionalized particles is crucial. Here, we report results from Monte Carlo simulations of the pair-interaction between particles coated with single-stranded DNA sticky ends that are connected to the surface by relatively short and stiff surface tethers. We complement our calculations with a study of the interaction between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
145
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure with the highest predicted percent of DNA duplexes is considered to be the stable structure realized from the building blocks (for further details, see Materials and Methods). It must be stressed here that this model ignores important entropic contributions to the hybridization process as noted by both Frenkel and coworkers and Dreyfus and coworkers (13,(17)(18)(19). With this caveat we use this contact model, along with the genetic algorithm (GA) approach, to design the building blocks that will assemble into desired crystal structures selected from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure with the highest predicted percent of DNA duplexes is considered to be the stable structure realized from the building blocks (for further details, see Materials and Methods). It must be stressed here that this model ignores important entropic contributions to the hybridization process as noted by both Frenkel and coworkers and Dreyfus and coworkers (13,(17)(18)(19). With this caveat we use this contact model, along with the genetic algorithm (GA) approach, to design the building blocks that will assemble into desired crystal structures selected from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of theories and simulations have been developed to delineate the hybridization interactions between two interacting DNA-NPs (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Despite the success of these theories in providing insights into the ground-state free energy, they are generally limited to enumerating interactions at the twoparticle level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the success of these theories in providing insights into the ground-state free energy, they are generally limited to enumerating interactions at the twoparticle level. They also ignore any entropic effects relevant to this self-assembly process (9)(10)(11)(12)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). Molecular dynamics simulations avoid these difficulties and extend this analysis to superlattice self-assembly so as to provide a detailed understanding of the effects of kinetics (13), DNA sequence (14), and electrostatics (15,16,22) on lattice stability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have reported interaction models (9,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), all based on capturing the entropic contributions and hybridization thermodynamics of individual grafted DNA molecules. While these models qualitatively describe the existing interaction measurements based on the temperature-dependent aggregation-disaggregation transition of DNA-labeled nanoparticles (16), microparticles (12,14,(17)(18)(19), and polymers (20), or direct measurements with optical tweezers (9), they typically overpredict the interaction strength by roughly two orders of magnitude, corresponding to an unexpectedly large hybridization free energy difference of ∌5 k B T per DNA bridge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%