2022
DOI: 10.12962/j25807471.v6i1.12317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study of Blended Winglet Geometry Variations on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Aerodynamic Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have evaluated the performance of blended and cant winglets [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In most cases, the design is quite simple.…”
Section: Spikeletmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have evaluated the performance of blended and cant winglets [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In most cases, the design is quite simple.…”
Section: Spikeletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balaji et al (2022) [21] compared various winglet shapes on a cambered airfoil and reported that the NACA 6321 airfoil with a 95° blended winglet achieved the highest aerodynamic efficiency due to the optimized angle for drag reduction. Pertiwi et al (2022) [22] used a neural network to predict UAV performance with blended winglets and found that the cant angle had the most significant influence on the lift-to-drag ratio and affected the relationship between the wingtip shape and the cant angle. Al Khafaji et al (2023) [23] used computational analysis and reported that a 60° cant angle, 20% winglet span, and 5° angle of attack yielded the best lift-to-drag ratio for their winglet design.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an examination was conducted to assess the impact of the winglet's offset on the wing's aerodynamic performance. Geometry design uses XFLR5 assistance by choosing winglet factors in the form of offset and cant angle because XFLR5 has limitations in making winglet designs [31]. XFLR5 uses XFOIL data in two dimensions to calculate lift, drag, pitching moment, and pressure coefficient [32].…”
Section: Winglet Geometry Design With Xflr5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of the BPNN in their study helped them to correctly estimate the speed of the vehicle. Pertiwi et al [21] employed a BPNN to predict the ratio of lift to drag coefficients at different angles of attack. They trained their model using three input parameters, namely the tip chord, winglet height and cant angle, and one output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%