2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.79.020102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical studies of Lifshitz interactions between dielectrics

Abstract: We study numerically the fluctuation-derived interaction between dielectrics in both two and three dimensions. We demonstrate how sparse matrix factorizations enable one to study torsional interactions in three dimensions. In two dimensions we study the full crossover between nonretarded and retarded interactions as a function of separation. We use constrained factorizations in order to measure the interaction of a particle with a rough dielectric surface and compare with a scaling argument.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until recently, most works on the subject had been restricted to simple geometries, such as parallel plates or similar approximations thereof. However, new theoretical methods capable of computing the force in arbitrary geometries have already begun to explore the strong geometry dependence of the force and have demonstrated a number of interesting effects [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. A substantial motivation for the study of this effect is from recent progress in the field of nanotechnology, especially in the fabrication of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS), where Casimir forces have been observed [16] and may play a significant role in "stiction" and other phenomena involving small surface separations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, most works on the subject had been restricted to simple geometries, such as parallel plates or similar approximations thereof. However, new theoretical methods capable of computing the force in arbitrary geometries have already begun to explore the strong geometry dependence of the force and have demonstrated a number of interesting effects [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. A substantial motivation for the study of this effect is from recent progress in the field of nanotechnology, especially in the fabrication of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS), where Casimir forces have been observed [16] and may play a significant role in "stiction" and other phenomena involving small surface separations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New computational methods for Casimir interactions [3][4][5][6][7][8] have become important in order to model nonplanar micromechanical systems where unusual Casimir effects have been predicted, and there has been increasing interest in T > 0 corrections [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], especially in recently identified systems where these effects are non-negligible [12]. Although T > 0 effects are easy to incorporate in the imaginary frequency domain, where they merely turn an integral into a sum over Matsubara frequencies [20], they are nontrivial in time domain because of the singularity of the zero-frequency contribution, and we show that a naive approach leads to incorrect results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realistic, general numerical methods to solve for Casimir forces were simply unavailable; solutions were limited to special high-symmetry geometries (and often to special materials like perfect metals) that are amenable to analytical and semi-analytical approaches. This is not to say that there were not, in principle, decadesold theoretical frameworks capable of describing fluctuations for arbitrary geometries and materials, but practical techniques for evaluating these theoretical descriptions on a computer have only been demonstrated in the last few years [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In almost all cases, these approaches turn out to be closely related to computational methods from classical EM, which is fortunate because it means that Casimir computations can exploit decades of progress in computational classical EM once the relationship between the problems becomes clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%