2019
DOI: 10.1002/mma.5942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solutions of random mean square Fisher‐KPP models with advection

Abstract: This paper deals with the construction of numerical stable solutions of random mean square Fisher‐Kolmogorov‐Petrosky‐Piskunov (Fisher‐KPP) models with advection. The construction of the numerical scheme is performed in two stages. Firstly, a semidiscretization technique transforms the original continuous problem into a nonlinear inhomogeneous system of random differential equations. Then, by extending to the random framework, the ideas of the exponential time differencing method, a full vector discretization … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Ė is the shifted Legendre coefficient approximation of the unit step function and 29) in (24),…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Ė is the shifted Legendre coefficient approximation of the unit step function and 29) in (24),…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positivity and boundedness preserving difference scheme is studied by Dingwen and Zilin [23]. In their article, Casabán et al [24] discuss the numerical solutions of random mean square Fisher–KPP models with advection. In their article, Blath et al [25] discuss the existence and uniqueness of a class of SPDEs with seed bank, modeling the spread of a beneficial allele in a spatial population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another powerful technique suitable for models with complex geometries is the finite element method [9]. Iterative methods, for instance FD have particular troubles derived from the storage accumulation of intermediate levels when the computer manages symbolically the involved stochastic processes, [10][11][12]. This drawback of the iterative methods for solving PDEM occurs in both approaches, the one based on Itô calculus [13] the so-called stochastic differential approach (SDEA), as well as the one based on the mean square calculus [14] also called random differential equations approach (RDEA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%