2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4820355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solutions of coupled Burgers’ equations by an implicit finite-difference scheme

Abstract: In this paper, an implicit exponential finite-difference scheme (Expo FDM) has been proposed for solving two dimensional nonlinear coupled viscous Burgers’ equations (VBEs) with appropriate initial and boundary conditions. The accuracy of the method has been illustrated by taking two numerical examples. Results are compared with exact solution and those already available in the literature by finding the L1, L2, L∞ and ER errors. Excellent numerical results indicate that the proposed scheme is efficient, reliab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the test problem I, we have taken a grid size 20×20 with time step ∆t = 0.0001 and Re = 100. Computed and exact values of u and v are shown in Tables II and III along with the results given by Srivastava et al 14,15 and Bahadir 9 at some typical grid point. The tabulated results show that the proposed scheme produces better results than Bahadir.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the test problem I, we have taken a grid size 20×20 with time step ∆t = 0.0001 and Re = 100. Computed and exact values of u and v are shown in Tables II and III along with the results given by Srivastava et al 14,15 and Bahadir 9 at some typical grid point. The tabulated results show that the proposed scheme produces better results than Bahadir.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the test problem II, numerical computations are carried out with parameters: 20×20 grid, t = 0.625, ∆t =0.0001 for Re = 50, 100 and 500, in order to compare the computed results with those given by Jain and Holla, 5 Bahadir, 9 and Srivastava et al 14,15 Table VI shows the comparisons of numerical results obtained using MCB-DQM scheme at t = 0.625 with the methods of Jain and Holla, 5 Bahadir, 9 and Srivastava et al 14,15 From Table VI, it can be noticed that the computed MCB-DQM results are in good agreement with Jain and Holla, 5 Bahadir, 9 and Srivastava et al 14,15 Fig. 3 depicts MCB-DQM computed u and v solutions corresponding to Re =50, 100 and 500 at t = 0.625.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rashid and Ismail [21] used a Fourier pseudo-spectral method for solving the coupled Burgers' equation, and Kaya [15] has solved the coupled Burgers' equation by the Adomain decomposition method in the form of a convergent power series with easily computable components. The variational iteration method [2], the homotopy perturbation method [23], the cubic B-spline method [18] and the implicit finite-difference method [22] are used for solving the coupled Burgers' equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bahadir [17] applied a finite -difference fully implicit technique to the discretization of coupled nonlinear Burger's equation and resolved the nonlinearity with the Newton's method. Other finite difference applications can be found in Srivastava et al [18], Srivastava et al [19]. These followed earlier work by Wubs and Goede [20], and Goyon [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%