2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0307-904x(99)00056-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of the two-dimensional unsteady dam break

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe a bore travelling downstream and a rarefaction wave travelling upstream. The results are, in general, similar to results presented in the literature [2,24,23] with the exception of the Gibbs oscillations inevitably produced by a high-order method without limiting. The solution is initially improved by the increase of polynomial order.…”
Section: Dam-breaksupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We observe a bore travelling downstream and a rarefaction wave travelling upstream. The results are, in general, similar to results presented in the literature [2,24,23] with the exception of the Gibbs oscillations inevitably produced by a high-order method without limiting. The solution is initially improved by the increase of polynomial order.…”
Section: Dam-breaksupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Specifically, it is solved by total variation diminishing version of the weight averaged flux method, with extended Harten-Leer-Lax Riemann solver [40,54]. As explained in the references above, the shoreline is captured by solving exact Riemann problem on the dry/wet interface.…”
Section: Surface Wave Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to avoid the singularity of the numerical solution at the intersection point, they had to pre-wet the bed in front of the dam by an artificial thin fluid layer. Several numerical studies performed during the past few years were based on the solution of nonlinear shallow-water equations using different methods such as the finite-volume method, the finite-difference method and so on (see [6][7][8][9][10][11]). There are very few asymptotic analyses of the dam-break problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%