2001
DOI: 10.1086/319722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Solution of the Time‐dependent Kinetic Equation for Anisotropic Pitch‐Angle Scattering

Abstract: A new powerful numerical method is developed for solving the time-dependent kinetic equation describing the anisotropic pitch-angle scattering of charged particles. The model includes the e †ects of adiabatic focusing in a radial magnetic Ðeld, adiabatic deceleration, anisotropic pitch-angle scattering, and convection in a magnetized plasma and signiÐcantly generalizes a model introduced by in Kota 1994. The pitch-angle scattering is assumed to scatter slowly through 90¡. By applying Legendre polynomial expans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An effective numerical approach for solving is to separate the distribution function f to two parts, one being the unscattered part, F and the other describing the scattering effects f s and then solve using a polynomial expansion method [ Zank et al , 2000b]. Instead of entering the details of that paper, we are interested here in relating the results of Zank et al [2000b] [see also Lu et al , 2002] to single particle motion in the absence of scatterings. Equations (4.10) and (4.11) of Zank et al [2000b] describe the separation of f into F and f s with adiabatic cooling and focusing included.…”
Section: Particle Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective numerical approach for solving is to separate the distribution function f to two parts, one being the unscattered part, F and the other describing the scattering effects f s and then solve using a polynomial expansion method [ Zank et al , 2000b]. Instead of entering the details of that paper, we are interested here in relating the results of Zank et al [2000b] [see also Lu et al , 2002] to single particle motion in the absence of scatterings. Equations (4.10) and (4.11) of Zank et al [2000b] describe the separation of f into F and f s with adiabatic cooling and focusing included.…”
Section: Particle Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the solar wind is manifest through the presence of V sw in the second, third, and fourth terms. We have ignored in equation (5) the following: terms of OðvV sw =c 2 Þ and time-varying magnetic field (Kulsrud & Pearce 1969), the spiral Parker IMF and variable solar wind velocity (Skilling 1975;Ruffolo 1995;Isenberg 1997;Lu, Zank, & Webb 2001), and particle momentum transport associated with the tensor elements D lP and D PP (Schlickeiser 1989a(Schlickeiser , 1989b, which are smaller than the pitch-cosine diffusion coefficient D ll by OðV A =vÞ and O½ðV A =vÞ 2 , respectively (Appendix B). Equation (5) reduces to the focused transport equation (Kulsrud & Pearce 1969;Roelof 1969) for V sw ¼ 0.…”
Section: Energetic Particle Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surprisingly effective quasinumerical approach has been used to model the transport of interstellar pickup ions. 42,43 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%