1995
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540160308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation: Developing more robust and efficient methods

Abstract: We present a robust and efficient numerical method for solution of the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation arising in molecular biophysics. The equation is discretized with the box method, and solution of the discrete equations is accomplished with a global inexact-Newton method, combined with linear multilevel techniques we have described in a paper appearing previously in this journal. A detailed analysis of the resulting method is presented, with comparisons to other methods that have been proposed in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
253
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
253
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common numerical techniques for solving the PB equation are based on discretization of the domain of interest into small regions. Those methods include finite difference (Davis and McCammon, 1989;Nicholls and Honig, 1991;Holst and Saied, 1993;Holst and Saied, 1995;Baker et al, 2001), finite element Friesner, 1997a, 1997b;Baker et al, 2000;Holst et al, 2000;Baker et al, 2001;Dyshlovenko, 2002), and boundary element methods (Zauhar and Morgan, 1988;Juffer et al, 1991;Allison and Huber, 1995;Bordner and Huber, 2003;Boschitsch and Fenley, 2004), all of which continue to be developed to further improve the accuracy and efficiency of electrostatics calculations in the numerous biomolecular applications described below. The major software packages that can be used to solve the PB equation are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Iiic Poisson-boltzmann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common numerical techniques for solving the PB equation are based on discretization of the domain of interest into small regions. Those methods include finite difference (Davis and McCammon, 1989;Nicholls and Honig, 1991;Holst and Saied, 1993;Holst and Saied, 1995;Baker et al, 2001), finite element Friesner, 1997a, 1997b;Baker et al, 2000;Holst et al, 2000;Baker et al, 2001;Dyshlovenko, 2002), and boundary element methods (Zauhar and Morgan, 1988;Juffer et al, 1991;Allison and Huber, 1995;Bordner and Huber, 2003;Boschitsch and Fenley, 2004), all of which continue to be developed to further improve the accuracy and efficiency of electrostatics calculations in the numerous biomolecular applications described below. The major software packages that can be used to solve the PB equation are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Iiic Poisson-boltzmann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing yielded grid resolutions Ͼ 2.4 grid units/Å (34). The linearized form of the PB equation was solved by the inexact Newton method with a multilevel solver algorithm to aid convergence (35). The solute was mapped on the grid with PARSE charge and radii parameters (13).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Fdpb Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then solve the algebraic equation with inexact-Newton method for the modified PB equation. 27,28 A small trick is used during discretization for the "Bratu" type problem, i.e., we approximate the second-order derivative using a nonlinear denominator 29 which works well near bifurcation points.…”
Section: With Much Smaller Computational Time Cost (O(n 2 )) and Stormentioning
confidence: 99%