2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10092-010-0029-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, starting from the scattering data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 can be used to determine, for each method, what is the resolution δ α (and, correspondingly, the number of points N F = 2T /δ α ) required for the computation of the integrals in order to find the solution u(t) with a given accuracy. This, in turn, will affect the complexity of the method according to (4), (5), or (7). Another relevant parameter that affects the computational complexity of the NCG and IC methods (but not that of the NT and IC1 methods) is the resolution δ t = cδ α /2 with which the solution u(t) is needed (or, equivalently, the number of points N u = N F /c in which the solution must be computed).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4 can be used to determine, for each method, what is the resolution δ α (and, correspondingly, the number of points N F = 2T /δ α ) required for the computation of the integrals in order to find the solution u(t) with a given accuracy. This, in turn, will affect the complexity of the method according to (4), (5), or (7). Another relevant parameter that affects the computational complexity of the NCG and IC methods (but not that of the NT and IC1 methods) is the resolution δ t = cδ α /2 with which the solution u(t) is needed (or, equivalently, the number of points N u = N F /c in which the solution must be computed).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 5 compares the computational complexity required by the various methods, computed according to (4), (5), and (7), to obtain the solution u(t) with a desired RMSE of 2 × 10 −3 (about 2 −9 in Fig. 4), as a function of the desired resolution δ t .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be proven then that certain associated scattering functions K ( x , z ) satisfy and hence the potential Θ( x ) = K ( x , x ) is also bounded. In [31, 32, 33] a complete discussion and comparison between the former and other alternative conditions which guarantee solvability of the direct problem is given.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%